ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: July 20 – Berkeley [details]

Emotional Support Group Meetings – Los Angeles:  May 25, June 22, July 27  [details]

ACSOL Conference June 14/15 in Los Angeles

ACSOLCalifornia

Sierra Madre Stops Enforcement of Sex Offender Ordinance

The City of Sierra Madre has agreed to stop enforcement of its sex offender ordinance, which prohibited all registered sex offenders, from residing in most of the city and from being present in child safety zones that included the city’s schools, parks and public library.  The Sierra Madre City Council approved this action on December 10 after being sued in federal district court by one of the city’s four registered citizens.  The legal challenge was based upon allegations that the city ordinance violated the 1st, 5th and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution.
 
“This is a significant victory for all registered citizens within the state of California,” stated attorney Janice Bellucci, who represented the registered citizen.  “It restores the civil rights of registered citizens who live within the City of Sierra Madre as well as those who wish to visit that city.”
 
According to terms of the settlement agreement, the ultimate fate of the city ordinance will depend upon a future ruling by the California Supreme Court in the case In re Taylor, That case is expected to decide whether residency restrictions are constitutional and, if so, if their application is limited to registered citizens on parole.  The Supreme Court granted review of this case in December 2012.
 
“This settlement agreement is a good model for other cities, who have enacted residency restrictions, to follow,” stated Bellucci.  “It protects such cities from future lawsuits until the state Supreme Court decides this important matter.”
 
In addition to stopping enforcement of its ordinance, the City of Sierra Madre agreed to pay attorneys fees and costs in exchange for a dismissal of the case.

Join the discussion

  1. Bluewall

    Wow!

  2. Ron

    Great Job Janice!

  3. Eric Knight

    Congratulations! Fees and court costs a bonus!

  4. FRegistryTerrorists

    Ms. Bellucci: You cannot be thanked enough. Good job again.

    We are all in a war against criminal regimes and terrorists whose main focus is often nothing more than lowering the quality of our lives. It is unacceptable for them to steal from me and I will steal from them in retaliation.

  5. Anonymous Nobody

    Gee, I was just over in Sierra Madre last week checking out Christmas light. How was I supposed to know I wasn’t allowed there and could land in jail for being there?!

    How are you supposed to drive down a street without somewhere along the way being in one of these “child safety zones?” And you mean I can’t even visit my friend, who happens to live on the edge of one of these zones — -surely the also violates the Constitutional right to associate, to assemble?

    • FRegistryTerrorists

      Exactly. And the people who say that you can’t do those things are stealing from you and your family and attacking you. They are not your fellow citizens. They are enemies.

  6. bruce

    Good Work Mam, Thank You I hope other Counties Recognize this achievement.

  7. bruce

    @ FRegistryTerrorists: You Are Correct & That is exactly what needs to be addressed is that the fact IS We have been FAMILIES INCLUDED Made Public Enemy #1 Due To the Public Registry. It is More than painting some group with a broad brush it is Classifying a portion of the Entire Population there by setting up a divide and conquer issue in an already Volatile socially fragmented Country! What’s Next,, is cant live? (*)_(*)

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer this question to prove that you are not a robot *

.