City of Duarte to Repeal Ordinance

The City of Duarte is expected to repeal its sex offender ordinance, according to a letter from City Attorney Dan Slater dated April 30. According to that letter, the actions are the result of “a threat” from California RSOL to sue the City if it did not repeal its ordinance.

The City Attorney noted in his letter the California Supreme Court decision dated April 23, 2014, which denied review of two decisions by the Court of Appeal which determined that offender laws by cities, similar to that adopted by Duarte, were preempted by state law. The letter further stated, “given that we will be promptly presenting the repeal ordinance to the City Council, we trust you will take no action to initiate litigation against the City seeking repeal of the ordinance.”

“The City of Duarte is to be commended for its wise decision to repeal its ordinance,” stated CA RSOL president Janice Bellucci. “Due to its wise decision, the City will not be sued.”Duarte - Repeal - April 2014

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Wise choice by Duarte.

One of the things that I’ve been wanting to do is to create a packet that we can provide for cities to use to assist their citizens on ACTUAL, proactive methods to prevent child predation. While it’s always satisfying when a city repeals ordinances, the ability to provide sound, proactive solutions and methods would be as important (to the citizens) as the actual repeal of the ordinance itself.

Perhaps we can start a collaboration on this project.

That’s what I’m talking about, thanks Janice, frank, chance and the team.

It’s getting to the point that we are able to actually see which city attorneys, district attorneys, city council members, etc actually have common sense by their reaction and what they do with the letters they get from CA-RSOL. City Attorney Dan Slater obviously has a good head on his shoulders; then there are the ones like the king of dumbness his self, the ever honorable, obstinate, ill informed, twister of truth, Tony Rackauckas. It’s getting rather humorous listening to their statements after Janice gives them a much needed and well deserved information spanking that reminds them that they are not as special as they think they are and that they, too, are required to abide by state law. ★