ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule

ACSOLCalifornia

Sacramento County sued over sex offender ordinance

Sacramento County became the latest governmental entity Wednesday to be sued over an ordinance limiting the movements of registered sex offenders near parks and other public places, but the practical effect of the suit may be negligible. Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
    1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
    2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
    3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
    4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
    5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
    6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
    7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
    8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
    9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
    10. Please do not post in all Caps.
    11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
    12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
    13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
    14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
    15. Please do not solicit funds
    16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
    17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
    18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This article says

“the practical effect of the suit is unclear because of earlier court rulings in Southern California that invalidated similar ordinances.”

Well, it’s pretty clear to me. We registrants have been expected to snap our fingers and tap dance as fast and often as they demanded, or face consequences; usually jail or prison. Now that the shoe is on the other foot and it’s they that must now snap their fingers and tap dance to our tune they are confused and complaining. I for one have been taking great pleasure watching Janice compel these fools to obey the law in a court of law. Thanks Janice; This is more music to my ears and You ROCK! ♫

Wouldn’t it be nice if we could send some of them to prison foe not repealing or staying their illegal ordinances? ☠

Yes you ROCK!!!!

“With the potential of all or most of these ordinances being rescinded in light of the court’s ruling, the Legislature should pass appropriate laws that will complement Jessica’s Law and the intent of California voters and protect our children from easy access by sex offenders.”

Ummmmmm….the legislature already has…..ummmmm….has Ms. Scully ever heard of Chelsea’s Law????

Is there some sort of low I.Q. requirement to become a District Attorney or something???

Are you referring to this one ?

http://abcnews.go.com/US/court-oks-barring-high-iqs-cops/story?id=95836

A man whose bid to become a police officer was rejected after he scored too high on an intelligence test has lost an appeal in his federal lawsuit against the city.

This “article” is not journalism, it is pure commentary. In fact it’s outright propoganda. Shame on you, Sacramento Bee, for publishing this tripe.

The DA’s who hold on to these ordinances may be intelligent in the political sense, but more likely they have an overly developed sense organ for determining public opinion and a lack of wisdom. Basing policies on opinion, rather than evidence is like the proverbial building one’s house on sand. The building inspector comes by and tells them to take it down or face a fine. They would rather have the whole house fall down and pay the fine (hey, it’s not out of their pockets) than risk looking incompetent to their clients (also ignorant).

7
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.