Police can stop vehicles based on anonymous 911 tips, justices rule

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court has upheld the authority of police officers to stop cars and question their drivers based on an anonymous tip to a hot line.

In a 5-4 decision written by Justice Clarence Thomas, the justices ruled that such stops do not amount to an unreasonable search or seizure, even if the arresting officer did not observe the vehicle speeding or swaying while driving down the highway. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This is uncalled for. Do we have the ability to get some sort of proof that a call was indeed made, or tip provided? We have a right to face our accusers in court, but not before court? In order to go to court, we need to have a reason. If i feel i’m being harassed by cops or some other “concerned citizen”, then i should have a full legal right to know who’s behind it. It’s due to the registry that i’ve been repeatedly and constantly harassed, especially during my time on parole.

yes your right Jason.. If a stalker were to call the hotline everytime I leave the house. what good would that do ?

If I remember right, wasn’t Thomas involved in a sexual harassment issue when he was appointed?

What I see is some registry troll that thinks he/she has the right to punish you again after you have served your time and paid your debt to society, calling on multiple registrants, or just the ones in their neighborhood and placing the public in danger by diverting resources away from real threats to society. And just as sure as the sun always rising in the east you can be sure this is going to catch on with the vigilantes and other haters. I see this getting really bad if it isn’t checked. This is going to turn into a new form of vigilantism. 🙁

Well, this pales compared to the ability of cops to gang murder homeless men and get off scot free. All those little frightened American voters who want to be protected from bad guys to the nth degree are authorizing a police state, that will be very difficult to dismantle.