Do sex offender restrictions work?

JONESBORO, AR (KAIT) – When we talk about sex offenders emotion tends to take over.  Call it a protective instinct.  We don’t want them living near our children or where our children go to school or play.
The thoughts are terrifying to any parent.  But as we found out, those fears, don’t match the facts. “There is no data, according to my knowledge, that sex offender registry restrictions prevent sexual assault,” Sheri Flynn told Region 8 News. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I find it sad that this question even has to be asked. But at this point asking the question is necessary. I also have to say that “offender restrictions” never have worked and that it’s absolutely impossible for them to ever work because there never was a problem in the first place.

The author is being too kind when he uses the word emotional, no matter how accurately one may think that word fit’s the situation. I think foolish/stupid is a more fitting description of the mentality that conjures up these ideas for a phantom threat that empirical fact/evidence proves never existed.

The statement by Sheri Flynn does not hold water either because empirical evidence proves that the vast majority of offenses occur between people familiar with each other and where there is trust. She says –

“To me, it makes more sense to base where sex offenders can be based on what they do, the crime they commit with whom they commit it with. Those are the people we don’t want around our minor children.” –

Her statement reinforces the “stranger danger” myth. She is just another lunatic in the crowd of lunatics that believe what credible experts call a myth, which is more accurately, a lie. It’s amazing all the authoritative terms and actions taken for the nonexistent problem they chase; this is the epitome of mentally lame.

These people promote fear; a fear that is about as likely to happen as a lightening strike at exactly 4:pm on Friday the 13th. Yet this “sex crime” myth is so firmly entrenched in the minds of the mentally lesser masses that the question must be asked to get them to at the very least try to use their brains instead of just reacting.

The truth will set you free.

It’ll set us free too!!!!!

This nation is based on a foundation of law…as a free society I believe you hold the standards of punishment / parole within the three years alloted (maybe some are five parole years) and that’s it…!…leave people alone …there is no further ‘they should’ or ‘they need to’……you need to stop putting people up to further restraint…you plead guilty…you first to have restrictions beyond everyone else…remember you gave up .