ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Nov 21, Dec 19 – Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings 2020 (Phone only)

General News

Don’t Water Down This Law [Editorial]

Along with big-time drug dealers and terrorists, registered sex offenders may constitute the most odious group of individuals with which society must contend.

But despite the disdain most people feel for them, a movement is afoot to strike down local ordinances that go beyond the limits of California law, which restricts only those sex offenders who are on parole and whose victims were under age 14 from visiting public parks without their parole officer’s OK. Full Editorial

Join the discussion

  1. AJ Smith

    The newspaper failed to mention that the San Bernardino County law conflicts with state law and therefore is invalid. Continuing to prosecute this law against anyone is illegal.

    • Eric Knight

      The newspaper has decided to have an opinion, then tried to fit their “facts” around the opinion. Keep in mind they don’t even approach the actual LAWS that result from the registry (residential restrictions) that are bletantly punitive, but rather the actual registry itself.

      If the registry were JUST about Internet listings and once a year mail-in registration forms, it would be regulatory, according the the original SCOTUS decision. The paper is trying to infer that all the other laws that come as a result of the registry is ALSO regulatory, which is a crock.

  2. Q

    How is it these people talk and act as though state law doesn’t apply to them, and that they are not bound by oath or anything else to respect and comply with state law?

  3. Michael

    Another example of not letting the FACTS interfere with one’s opinion or decision making process.

  4. Tim

    Water down this law, it’s poisoning the Constitution.

    • Joe

      There is nothing to water down. A law is either constitutional or it isn’t. This one is not. Any qualification of ‘unconstitutional’ is like ‘a little bit pregnant’.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

.