ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Nov 21, Dec 19 – Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings 2020 (Phone only)

ACSOLCalifornia

The Better Part of Valor: Amending Local Sex Offender Ordinances

A series of lawsuits against California cities has brought the issue of sex offenders in the community back to many city agendas and local public meetings. Two recent decisions by the California Court of Appeal and a case pending before the California Supreme Court effectively limit cities’ ability to enforce local ordinances regulating registered sex offenders who live in their jurisdictions. Few city officials or residents favor the idea of repealing an ordinance intended to protect children from predators, but many cities with such ordinances are being forced to do just that as a result of legal challenges. By moving quickly and carefully, city councils can address the appellate rulings and avoid paying for the privilege of repealing their ordinances. Full Article

Source: Western City – THE MONTHLY MAGAZINE OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES

Join the discussion

  1. B

    This article begs for a response from RSOL. It will be a great opportunity to educate elected officials about how these local ordinances have nothing to do with public safety, but has everything to do with “moral escalation” (to use Jerry Brown’s term). We should quote the CDCR statistics and talk about how many resources are wasted on 290s while murder clearance rates are shockingly low, gang violence flourishes and property crimes are mostly ignored by police. Denying the facts about 290s is the same kind of mindlessness as climate change denials.

  2. Eric Knight

    You will note the following in Footnote 10:

    “My thanks to Lindsay Tabaian, assistant city attorney for Hesperia, and Eric Dunn, Hesperia city attorney, for providing this strategem.”

    Yes, contact the opposition please. While the article portends to be neutral and directed to “pragmatic defensibilty,” it lacks CONSTITUTIONAL fortitude as well as actual “pragmatic effect,” such as “no child has EVER been assaulted or propositioned by a registered sex offender who was Trick or Treating,” or “proximity to schools does NOT increase the likelihood of assault.”

    Yes, I agree that a response is not only necessary, but also insisted upon as a rebuttal.

    • FRegistryTerrorists

      Every Registered person should contact the authors of this article. I certainly will.

    • B

      Everyone involved in municipal government reads this magazine. The writers of the article might not be our friend, but by writing a response, we have a chance to talk to many council members, city attorneys and police chiefs. Also, I think the Hesperia Councilmembers were substantially more offensive than their legal staff.

      • Eric Knight

        Privately, I wonder what the legal staffs around the state REALLY feel about this issue. I would bet that this is the single biggest headache that most of them have to contend with, other than blatantly dishonest council creatures.

  3. Q

    The article needs to clearly define “predator.” This is just another intellectual piece that pretty much defines all registrants as “predators.” Were I not a registrant I would conclude that registrant=predator.

  4. Avig

    Who is “the predator”? I think it is just a propaganda term—part of the endless series of lies produced by politicians. In a way it is tragic for them too: the politicians seem unable to do much that is positive for their constituencies, thus to keep themselves in office and near the power to control the money-spigots of public funding, they must generate fear in the public: fear of registered citizens, evil forces abroad, alien ideologies, what have you. It is a process for which the rational citizen can only feel disgust.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

.