ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings
ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18, 2021


LAUSD Sorry It Successfully Argued Girl, 14, Consented to Sex with Teacher

The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) didn’t have a problem with attorney W. Keith Wyatt when he successfully defended them in a lawsuit last year by blaming a 14-year-old girl for having sex with a teacher. It saved the district a lot of money.

But they do have a problem with him now after word of how he won the case received publicity last week and he told public radio station KPCC on Thursday, “She lied to her mother so she could have sex with her teacher. She went to a motel in which she engaged in voluntary consensual sex with her teacher. Why shouldn’t she be responsible for that?” Full Article


Criminal Law Says Minors Can’t Consent — But Some Civil Courts Disagree (NPR)

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments


“Thanks, counselor, for saving us a ton of money! Your fired!”

Sad state of affairs when a legally constitutional argument is made that results in such action. When the laws are set based on irrational interpretation, irrationality ensues in its litigation and effect.

NEWS: A California lawmaker is now proposing that this legal argument (“minir consented to sexual activity”) be banned from use in civil cases as it is from criminal cases. But, so far, I have not heard any news media point out the very relevant fact that the rules and standards for civil procedures are notably different from criminal procedures. Not least regarding the standard for “guilt”. In criminal court, it is roughly, “beyond a reasonable doubt”. In civil actions, the bar for being found “guilty” is much lower, so it seems appropriate that different defense arguments should be permitted (whether… Read more »

Let me chime in one more time. I am still a bit peeved that the lawyer is getting the short shrift here. It is his constitutional DUTY to attack the law as much as possible with logical arguments. It is up to the JUDGE to allow or disallow certain arguments according to his or her constitutional adherence to the law. In short, if anyone is at “fault” it is the judge for allowing the supposition to be entered into the court record (presuming the opposing lawyer originally objected). In short, this is the first time I have EVER heard of… Read more »

The attorney did what he had to do in order to prevail.

The hypocrisy here is on one hand LAUSD is probably in the forefront of unconstitutional acts against registered citizens riding the child safety bandwagon but eager to save money based on a child’s poor decision that ultimately put her in harm’s way.

Ultimately their overriding responsibility is to their students – but here it is to protecting their coffers. Shameless, no doubt.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x