ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Nov 21, Dec 19 – Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings 2020 (Phone only)


TX: For $1.4 million, Dallas sex offender registration doesn’t buy much

If the goal is more stigma and shame, the operation succeeds spectacularly. For starters, the entrance is hidden around back of Dallas police headquarters, behind a rusting door, next to a small sign: “Sex Offender Registration Entrance Only.”

Inside, the atmosphere only gets worse. The dreary waiting room is almost always filled to capacity with people sitting glumly, waiting for hours to meet the strict reporting requirements of being a registered sex offender. Full Article

Join the discussion

  1. td777

    Great article, I’m glad someone in the mainstream media is starting to understand the absurdity that is the registry. It’s a shame the Texas Voices website isn’t nearly as active as this one. In some ways, it shows how they aren’t willing to do as much for registrants as Janice and CARSOL. If every state had as much going for them as we do here in California, I can’t help but think things would change much faster.

    • WantstoHelp

      Texas Voices is incredibly active and does tireless support on behalf of registrants. Their activity is simply not posted or seen on its website and I, for one, find that incredibly prudent. Sadly, TV does not have a full time lawyer to work these cases as CARSOL does, because no one has yet stepped up to accept that mantle. [Even from afar, we are grateful for Janice, and realize what a rare and special gift it is that registrants in California have her to fight for them.] Texas Voices members do network with the lawyers who handle these types of cases, as well as with other grass roots organizations fighting for criminal justice reform, and in some situations TV helps to fund lawsuits that have the potential to win changes on behalf of the state as a whole, but TV is actually a lobbying organization that has focused its efforts on getting legislation passed (or killed as the case may be) in a very conservative, hard-right leaning state. It is because of the TV efforts, and the efforts of its members, and the efforts of honest, thinking representatives, that legislation passed in the prior session to remove all registrants place of employment (address of the employer) from public registries. Now that businesses do not risk being publicly associated with a registrant, registrants have one less hurdle to overcome in finding employment.

      Texas does not have a “Jessica’s Law” on the books. Here, those who are still on parole or probation may be required to stay beyond a 1000 foot safety zone, but state law itself does not prevent registered citizens off paper from living anywhere. Cities and municipalities do have the right to set their own ordinances, and so we face a similar challenge to the constantly shifting rules. Getting legislation passed to unify the State on this matter will be an uphill battle, as there are cities who will throw efforts into preventing any law from passing that would curtail their ability to keep registered citizens out. However, there is currently a lawsuit winding its way through the civil courts in which a registered citizen has been given legal standing (as have his wife and children) to sue a city for damages due to excessive residence restrictions that essentially banished them living in the city. We will wait to see how this plays out. As you know, these cases grind exceedingly slow.

      I am not a Texas Voices representative and I’m not speaking on behalf of the organization. I’ve simply been witness to, and am incredibly grateful for, the tireless efforts of those within the organization who work on behalf of Texas’s registrants, and it hurts to see them disparaged simply because their website is not actively updated.

      • td777

        If they are more active than the website shows, you have my apology. I was rather surprised when I saw how little information was on their site and how little interaction was available there.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *