$18 Million in Taxpayer Dollars for a Program That Feeds the Sex-Offender Industry and Does Little Else

The Associated Press not only buries the lead in a story about California’s paroled Registered Citizens now being subject to periodic polygraph exams. The AP utterly misses the point.

Never mind that polygraphs simply are not reliable. They’re boogie-men used mainly to scare people into admitting to crimes they probably didn’t commit. The real story here, the story The AP can’t see, is about the sex-offender industry. Full Opinion

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

A short article that all these right leaning groups that are against greater taxation need to see. It could be a great article if it had more details and accurate information about how much the government, on every level, is spent not just on tracking and supervising registrants, but also in things like these entrapment stings, etc.

I have not got feed from this program, and the list they put us on do not protect us from attacks by cops or criminals.

Speaking of protection from “cops and criminals” lesser news organizations boldly stir the pot of hatred for RCs by showing the face of someone arrested, and/ or accused of some heinous sex crime, and then the media outlet asks the ignorant masses, “What sentence should this person get?’ How should this person be punished?” This fosters the idea that it is the public’s place to try cases, and inflict punishment. The comments the public makes, in response, are so graphic, they are too ugly to repeat. A pre-sentenced person is tried and convicted in the court of public opinion, and then reduced to a sub-human monster. People seem to compete with one another, in their desire for revenge, by suggesting the most terrible means of torture, without even know the facts of a case. This goes on daily on social media These news organizations seem to be encouraging vigilantism, lawlessness and mob rule, with the news media, which once only stirred the pot, now having an active role in instigating such dialogue.

It is a shame that each case is not individualized and a whole group is punished for an entire lifetime. Is there a murder registry? I know that true and haneous crimes do occur, however not all crimes have to do with children and can be a result from the hysteria surrounding rapes on colleges. There are true he/said she said cases but in the court of public opinion all a woman has to say these days is that she was raped and the male is tried and convicted and considered guilty and he has to spend the rest of his life proving otherwise. Believe it or not there are cases where the victim did lie but to try to prove it is impossible. A young man’s life is ruined forever. And each politician that wants to make a name for himself contributes to these idiotic laws being passed.

thank you for allowing us to have a voice