Some local ordinances have made it increasingly difficult for sex offenders to find housing. In response to restrictive buffer zones and housing bans, many sex offenders relocate to communities with fewer restrictions. Full Article and Radio Show
Related posts
-
WI: Wisconsin Supreme Court OKs warrantless searches of potential child porn
Source: courthousenews.com 2/24/26 Social platforms like Google Photos that voluntarily scan for child sexual abuse materials... -
WI: Wisconsin Assembly Okays Sadistic Ankle Monitors For Homeless Sex Offenders On and Off Paper
Source: maciverinstitute.com 2/13/16 The plan to keep an eye on sex offenders who don’t have homes... -
WI: Sex offenders who are homeless would have to wear GPS monitors under Republican bill
Source: wpr.org 12/22/25 Legislation comes as 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals considers constitutionality of Wisconsin’s...

“In most people’s minds, when they think of sex offenders, they think of a person in the bushes or a stranger preying on children. Clearly, that’s a sex offender too, but that’s only 3 to 5 percent of the sex offender population,”.
It is immoral and hopefully someday found unconstitutional for restrictions to be placed on the 95% for the repeat crimes of the 5%. Leave the 95% alone, because they will never re-offend. For the 5% use a program that accually has promise of working. Circles of Support and Accountability may be one such program. In two Canadian studies and one from Vermont, recidivism was shown to be drastically reduced, somewhere around 70% in the COSA programs. There is no credible report that residency restrictions do anything but make the problem worse. And how about studying the 95% and learning from those who have succeeded? There is always focus on the small portion who re-offend and then assuming the rest are the same. That is only 1/20th of the story.