TX: Closing Sex Offender Loophole

Admin
SAN ANTONIO – A state lawmaker says he’s making good on his promise to close a loophole in Texas law that could put children of sex offenders in danger. You would think that a convicted sex offenders’ parental rights would be revoked, but that’s not always the case. And it took a brave woman coming forward to the Trouble Shooters to get lawmakers at the State Capitol to take action. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This is frightening. There ARE sentencing laws and parole conditions that take crimes into consideration, but a blanket approach to assigning or denying visitation to parents solely for being on the sex offender register will only complicate children’s lives. The first thing that comes to mind is that there will be an accellerated uptick in false sex abuse charges by women whom wish to punish their ex’s, as the totality of the charge won’t be investigated.

This is strictly punitive, based upon the same emotional response of sheeple in general. Unfortunately, this law will overwhelmingly pass, and it will take lawsuits to ultimatelly get this law overturned…VERY EXPENSIVE lawsuits.

0

So ‘unsupervised visits’ in this case but does that mean a sex offender can’t be a parent at all? Or needs permission?

In a regular two parent house it’s not uncommon for a parent to be ‘unsupervised’ with their child.

This is BS and I hope it either doesn’t pass or someone sues.

0
Reply

Carlos Uresti, delinquent father and Texas State Senator from San Antonio that is proposing this unneeded bill to stop unsupervised visits from a parent who is a registrant is a father of a son who did 4 DUI’s. Carlos Uresti Jr.’s first 3 DUI’s didn’t get filed or were dismissed, so Carlos Jr, would not be disqualified from joining the military. The last one however, he did get convicted of. Carlos Jr. got the benefit of his dad’s connections on the first 3 cases however. The 3rd one involved Carlos Jr. on a high speed chase going over 90 mph and turning his car lights off to evade capture. The first incident Carlos Jr. crashed his Lexus into a tree, fled and falsely claimed the car was stolen, but later admitted filing a false police report. Maybe Carlos Uresti needs to crack down on DUI’s which kill more people than Texas SO’s and start in his own house.

0