CDCR Withdraws Halloween Sign Requirement Statewide –  more details to follow.

First Media Reports:

Decision made over requirement that paroled sex offenders post signs on Halloween (10News)
Sex Offenders on Parole Will Not Have to Post Signs on Door: Dept. of Corrections NBC
Sex offenders not required to post signs on Halloween CBS
No door signs required for parolees on Halloween   Union Tribune

For Release October 26 -The Southern District of California will conduct a hearing today regarding whether to grant a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that would halt a California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) requirement that sex offender parolees post a sign on the front door of their homes on Halloween. The hearing will be held at 2 p.m. in Courtroom 5D before Judge Jeffrey T. Miller.

“CDCR’s sign requirement is a solution without a problem,” stated attorney Janice Bellucci. “There are no reported cases of a child being sexually assaulted by a sex offender on Halloween while trick or treating.”

The Halloween sign requirement is part of CDCR’s annual Operation Boo which also prohibits sex offender parolees from opening their front door to trick-or-treaters and decorating their homes for the holiday. In addition, Operation Boo requires parolee sex offenders to have no outside lights at their home and to remain in their homes from 5 p.m. to 5 a.m. These requirements are not challenged.

“Several million public taxpayer dollars are being wasted by CDCR in its efforts to enforce Operation Boo,” stated Bellucci. “In addition, CDCR’s requirement to post a sign places in significant danger all sex offender parolees and members of their families.”

The lawsuit was filed on October 14, 2015, on behalf of plaintiff John Doe who lives in San Diego County and is required to register as a sex offender because he was convicted of a sex offense more than 30 years ago. Doe has not committed a subsequent sex offense, is not listed on the California Megan’s Law website and is currently on parole due to conviction for a drug offense.

The lawsuit was amended on October 19, 2015, on behalf of plaintiff James Roe who lives in Los Angeles County and is required to register as a sex offender due to his conviction of a sex offense in 2000. He has not committed a subsequent sex offense and is not listed on the California Megan’s Law website. He is currently on parole due to the requirements of an interstate compact under which he transferred from the state of his conviction to California in order to live near family members.

The TRO application was filed on October 22, 2015, and requests that CDCR’s sign requirement be halted statewide.




California Reform Sex Offender Laws
ACLU Building, 1313 W. 8th Street
Los Angeles, CA 90017
(503) 707-5200

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

God Bless you, Janice, and all tomorrow in court! I hope this TRO is granted. No government should ever be allowed to force speech among its citizens.

It’s still a shame that the laws prohibit participating in any way, especially considering the lack of empirical evidence that it protects anyone. What of those who have children? You know, I honestly don’t even know if it only applies to parolees?

I am no longer on parole, and haven’t been for five years. It’s been nearly 14 since my conviction. I have a 16 year-old son I missed out on participating with, and an 8 year-old daughter I am now missing out on. In years past I have carved pumpkins for family, because I enjoy the creativity of detailed artwork that has become more popular. But I own a house now, and it’s frustrating that I can’t decorate it at all… (At least I think I can’t).

Del Norte County’s probation department is also enforcing halloween restrictions:

I’m sure that CDCR is also.

… “Around this time of year my department always sends a notice to sex-offenders on the books, reminding them that Halloween is coming up,” said Lonnie Reyman, chief probation officer, “‘Don’t turn your lights on, don’t open your house,’ we tell them.” …

David Grieder, T. T.
David Grieder, T. (2015). Triplicate. triplicate.com. Retrieved 26 October 2015, from http://www.triplicate.com/News/Local-News/Lunch-with-the-Law-tackles-precautions-for-holidays

@ Forsaken

I recently discharged my number at the beginning of September of this year. I live in Santa Clara County. I specifically asked how I will be affected by Halloween. “Operation Boo” is only for Parolees. I plan on going with my boyfriend’s nephews while they trick or treat. I would check your local ordinances to make sure there are no specific rules regarding the participation or decoration of Halloween. No matter what, carve the crap outta that pumpkin! Good luck!

Best wishes to Janice et al!
Fingers crossed for a TRO TKO!

The San Diego Child Dependency Court along with CPS have kidnapped our daughter Danica for no reason other than I am a registered citizen. On December 17th, they are ready to strip me and my wife of our parental rights and adopt our daughter to the foster mom. We have done every visit, every class and requirement put before us, and the court is taking my wife’s parental rights because she wouldnt divorce me. They stole our daughter in may of last year, and she will turn two on January 27th. Neither one of us have family in the area, so they have given her to a stranger who has already filed to become the defacto parent and was granted. I see our hopes and options circling the drain and I dont know what to do anymore. I have hired a paid attorney, presented not one, but two psych reviews showing that I am of absolutely no danger to my daughter. It seems though that our efforts have been in vain and our arguments fall upon deaf ears.

I am hear partially to vent, but also to listen. I am here to listen to any suggestions or similar stories you might have, and to learn. I have been all over the city and the internet pleading my case, but it seems as though this is purely my fight and no one is stepping up to help. For anyone that is curious, the law that they are using against us is found here.


It truely is a frightening read for any registered citizen who has or is thinking of having a family. Educate yourself and be careful, it is hard to believe that our rights could be so violated by the law as to deny us our one most basic human right… to have a family. Be forewarned, that the state and cps can step in and lay this law upon your family for no reason at all. Anyone with questions or advice can contact me at XSJensen@gmail.com To thoes of you who reach this part, thank for the read… Good luck to all of you in our never ending fight, stay strong.

Whoo hoo! Way to fight the good fight Janice!!!

What a great beginning!!!! CONGRATULATIONS ….

Great Job Janice! Another victory for civil rights and the U.S. Constitution. I’ve become so used to you always winning, that I’ve become to expect it. I hope that we all don’t become complacent with our support and take your winning these court cases for granted.

Thank you for doing all that you do to protect Constitutional rights, and by extension, our rights. I don’t live in California, but what you are doing gives hope to all! The debt of gratitude we feel for you being the greatest champion of the causes that mean the most to us and our families is immeasurable, but THANK YOU! May your works for justice ripple across the nation!

Not surprising that the most abusive, divisive, irrational and off the point language occurs on these news sites that limit comments to Face Book users.

Wow KFI-AM 640 just did a lunchtime piece on Operation Boo and Janice’s successful efforts in doing away with sign on the front door requirement. Reporter Steve Gregory further expanded on Attorney Janice Bellucci’s continuing efforts to restore and protect all registered citizens rights. Janice was referred to several times during the broadcast. Thank you Janice, for all you do to protect registered citizens!!

I just paroled from prison after 10yr 2mo. Have no restrictions as too multimedia, social net works, but have family members of victim which have called in too parole to create problems. I must mention that it was a family related case, but i retained writing rights to my two other children through the family courts. Now my son is almost 19yrs old and through my brother. Found that over the years he received none of my letters, cards or anything. Parole seems to not care that he is now of age nor that the family now are using the parole authority to deny me my legal parental rights which the family court did take it account the criminal act prior too the order allowing me communication.