Reform the Sex-Offender Registry

In 1972, at the age of 21, Phillip Garrido had his first arrest. The charge: sexual assault of a minor. Four years later, he kidnapped and raped Katherine Callaway, a crime for which he received a 50-year sentence in the federal Leavenworth Penitentiary. During his trial, Garrido testified to masturbating while sitting outside middle schools and going on drug binges. After serving 11 years in federal prison and an additional seven months in Nevada State Prison, he was released in 1988 to parole authorities in Contra Costa County, Calif. For much of the next 20 years, as befitting a convicted sexual predator placed on sex offender registries, police and social workers often dropped by Garrido’s house. … The story of how Garrido went undetected for so long ought to raise serious questions about one of the least controversial and most widely adopted criminal justice policies: sex-offender registration. Full Op-Ed Piece

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Weekly Standard writer comes out AGAINST the registry!

Writer: Eli Lehrer (bio:

There are a few mistakes; for instance, registries did NOT cause drop in rapes. Correlation in this case is incorrect. Other recommendations such as civil commitment were mentinoed, but all in all, a good piece in a conservative website by a respected constitutional writer.

Okay I get it, people want to keep better track of the worst offenders or civilly commit them. Unfortunately none of these practices target the source problem. Anyone who believes it is impossible to understand why some people find prepubescent children attractive, what drives someone to expose themselves in public, or rape a person should be in a profession that isn’t concerned about these questions.

I dislike repeating the same facts over and over again, but reforming the registry will not ever help solve anything that happens prior to a law being broken. Under no circumstances do I foresee “teaching people not to rape or murder or rob a bank” as a workable solution. Although I absolutely can see the natural erosion of factors, circumstances, and situations that begin people down paths towards such activity being a viable front end option. The last resort should be law enforcement action and prosecution for anything illegal.

Do individuals who dress provocatively invite less than benevolent attention? Of course they do. The question that needs answering is; why do some people feel the desire or need to violate the provocatively dressed person? What other things in life could have occurred that would have lessened or prevented the development of this need/desire?

Those who target others for any purpose (including television demographics, clothing styles, shoe brands, and everything else) do so very specifically. So what made Jaycee Lee the ideal target of Phillip? In asking this question I don’t want general facts that were considered, but the extremely detailed and specific things which made the kidnapping a must do. Granted some of these might be so personal that they could have only been confirmed by Phillip after he had Jaycee. No person except Phillip knows what made the 11 year old Jaycee so attractive or over the 19 years everything that made him keep her around. Maybe she knows some things, but until both sides of the story are released in full gut wrenching (offensive detail) no one will be able to learn the most crucial elements that made everything progress as it did and this is the primary reason nothing has yet prevented in large part the creation of new victims. I don’t care if 50 trillion trillion trillion reasons exist that could potentially lead hours, days, weeks, months, years, or decades later to the commission of an illegal act. All 50 trillion trillion trillion reasons ought to be fully known and understood or else nothing will change.

“An extensive body of research shows that the only thing accomplished by public notification over the Internet is to harm property values in the neighborhoods where offenders live.”

And what about murder and assault? What about vandalism? Etc, etc, etc.

This author is just one more stupid individual proposing a hodge podge of changes; some good, and some bad. The state uses single one-off cases like the garrido case to remove our rights and generate fear. It’s also done with so called terrorist attacks which are many times one offs by mis guided people as a result of some usually illegal and morally wrong government policy or action. Our leaders are retards!

Actually our gov officials are masters at manipulations of the ignorant masses. Itsike they got a masters degree in manipulation and corruption.