MA: Judge says sex offender’s right to due process trumps public safety

In a recent ruling, a Superior Court judge said that concerns for public safety cannot trump a sex offender’s right to due process, FOX25 Investigates has learned.

On Aug. 16, Salem Superior Court judge Timothy Feeley, found the Sex Offender Registry Board violated one sex offender’s constitutional right to due process. His status as a level two sex offender was published on the internet on the same day he was classified, before he could file an appeal. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Tick tock, people. Don’t rush to accept a tiered system based on a faulty pre-crime evaluation made up to keep you under their thumbs.

We may be awhile more but it’s starting to happen. The judges are starting to speak out. That’s how it always begins, like whistleblowers, it takes those first brave souls. Then the trickle becomes a flood.

People lose their minds when the Constitution gets in the way of their agenda. The judge got the ruling right, required Constitutional protection far outweigh knee-jerk public safety concerns that are ineffective.

For the past couple of weeks it’s so nice to wake to such good findings–feeling better about the current direction of the courts!

So Fox 25 believes subverting the Constitution is good when it creates a false sence of security. That sort of reasoning should have everyone scared.
If they are advocating the overthrow of the Constitution, it is media outlets like this we should fear.

The “good” news about Massachusetts is at least they actually spend time trying figure out how an individual should be classified and said registrant is provided with an opportunity to appeal. In many of the “tiered” states, you classification is automatic and based on the AWA standards ro something similar. Under most of those, there is no way that an adult offender with a minor victim can ever be a Tier 1 registrant.