AZ: Supreme Court – Bail denial for child sex offenses is unconstitutional

PHOENIX — State laws that deny bail to people solely because they’re accused of having sex with a minor are unconstitutional, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled today.

The justices acknowledged arguments by prosecutors that trial judges have the right to keep certain people behind bars while awaiting trial as a method of protecting the public. And they said that the crime of sexual conduct with a minor is a series charge.

But Justice Clint Bolick, writing for the unanimous court, said the seriousness of the charge, by itself, is insufficient to result in automatic denial of release. He said prosecutors have to prove that a defendant poses a specific threat and that there are no conditions that can be imposed that allow that person’s release and protect the public. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Can anyone here see the writing on the wall? This just opened the door to do away with civil commitment (confinement to a pseudo-prison after serving a prison sentence) solely based on “might commit another sex offense”.

I have no idea how one might argue this in a courtroom, but I bet some here would.

WOW, finally, AZ Supreme was non partisan of the State Majority…someone saw the light. Now since Arpio’s gone, they may humanely treat RC’s better and NOT put them in perm. incarceration that atleast Maricopa Co. had done off and on. What a start for that State of AZ. Maybe other states will follow suite that don’t abide.
Why they haven’t done it with Murder’s, Arsonists, and DUI maimers, I don’t know. Guess they are still forgiven whilst RC’s are still bottom feeders in their mind. Good for AZ! Fairness is necessary. But, post decades and after school, moved here to Cali, and THINGS ARE WORSE!! (For RC’s). Close Watch. decades later. Gay vs. RC, weigh that out. AZ vs. CA. Thanks Nic for your comments too.

“The people of Arizona determined that sexual conduct with a minor is an acute problem and that pretrial detention for those accused of that crime was in the best interest of the community,” said Deputy Maricopa Attorney David Cole. 1. Is it an acute problem? 2. Facts will prove otherwise.

man these bastardssss are just trying to erode every constitutional right they can using us….indefinite incarceration( civil commitment), restrictions on free speech( Internet bans and indentifier disclosures), arbitrary oppression( lifetime parole and monitoring), absolutely no privacy rights ( public notification ie.megan’s law), taxation without representation(no public officials represents any of us), freedom to travel and association (IML,residency and presence restrictions), involuntary servitude (onerous, frequent and time consuming in person reporting requirements against our will), contract laws( forced into a contract under duress and coercion with threat of loss of freedoms under color of law), interference with our rights to raise and participate in gthe upbringing of our children and grandchildren( school bans, park bans, anywhere children congregate bans), violations of public lands use (federal and state recreation area and parks bans ie. nature trails, beaches, national or state parks, campgrounds, ect.), man I can go on and on….next it will be seperate bathrooms, back of the bus, separate waterfountains, we dont serve sex offenders signs in bussiness windows, lynchings, house burning, mob rules witchhunts and ostracism, governmental sanctioned vigilantism…….Wait almost all of those things are in action already……. Where’s our Thurgood Marshall……

This was a terrible proposal! This proposal was way out of line! What if your innocent? What if this was a custody issue or angry ex wife?