ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

National

CO: Weld officials discuss constitutional questions surrounding sex offender registry

From the outside, Robert’s life looks stable. He’s a private contractor who works in equipment financing. He has a home and a dog in Littleton. He dates regularly. In his spare time, he mountain bikes competitively and travels — most recently, he went to Iceland.

But he believes his life is fragile. So fragile, in fact, Robert is not his real name; he was so concerned about widespread publicity he only agreed to speak with The Tribune on condition of anonymity.

Not long ago, he made a shorter trip, this time to visit his brother in Oregon. While he was gone, a police officer came by his home, looking for him. When he couldn’t find Robert, the officer began to question his neighbor aggressively about where Robert was, what he was doing and when he would be back. Robert was, the officer reminded the neighbor, a registered sex offender. Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
22 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“She pointed out drunk drivers have a recidivism rate of about 60 percent, yet no public registry exists for them.”

And drunk drivers kill dozens (if not hundreds) of children each year. Just sayin’

Number of children murdered by sex offenders each year? I’ve come up with one or two for each of the last several years.

I actually looked this up recently and I believe the number of juvenile fatalities as a result of a DUI are around 1300 annually. Casualties in general are in the tens of thousands annually (adult and children).

Per the FBI, 450 children each year are murdered by their parents… just sayin’

Here is a YouTube piece entitled: Reality Check: The Parental Threat To Kids

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydKXs9lyT0g

“police told him they could come by every day if they wanted to”

The compliance cops told me this this last time they were at my house as well.
It is ironic that they default to this statement when their presence at your front door is challenged.

I`m fairly certain a judge would find that to be an excessive physical intrusion that amounts to a Fourth Amendment search, and they need a warrant for that.

Yeah, that kind of behavior would rise to harassment, and would also belie any claim of administrative duties. Perhaps next time they toss that out to you, throw back, “if you do, we can both find out what a judge thinks about such non-stop harassment.” But then that would involve speaking with them…

@Nondescript; A easy solution would be to learn your rights and exercise them. I had the cops coming over to harass me regularly until I got sick of it and learned my rights and exercised them. They didn’t like that someone; especially a sex offender, would dare to pull them up on their BS and exercise their rights, but I did and I haven’t seen them for several years now. Should the intrusions into my personal life and attempts to get me to forfeit my rights ever start up again I would simply do the same thing, stand up for… Read more »

Good for you Q! ( a nice little rhyme there) . I am indeed aware of how to interact with minion enforcers. I don’t answer any of their inquiries- ever. I ask THEM questions as it changes the dynamic of the encounter and takes a bit of their power away. Obviously, it would be better if one did not have to interact with them at all, but given our circumstances that is not always possible.

@Q:
” I actually walked the cop to the gate and invited him to stand outside of it with a hand gesture. I have never seen someone so bewildered in my life!”
Too funny! I’d buy you a drink, if I could.

“The registry only includes sex offenders who have been convicted of a felony, so those with misdemeanor convictions — such as urinating in public or indecent exposure — are not included.”

Ummm. What??? I beg to differ!

@Paul:
I expect the quote was in reference to CO law, not RC laws in general.

While he was gone, a police officer came by his home, looking for him. When he couldn’t find Robert, the officer began to question his neighbor aggressively about where Robert was, what he was doing and when he would be back. —– Good thing it was just a compliance check, and no indication of suspicion on the officer’s part. Let’s see, questioning others about activities of another citizen. Hmm, sure sounds like an investigation. What reasonable suspicion did the officer have? Oh my goodness, the person wasn’t home when they wanted him to be! Nope, no burdens here, SCOTUS. =====… Read more »

A few yrs back, while driving with my wife, I got pull over. After checking my ID, cop told me to get out of my car and asked me if I had told the woman I am driving with that I am a sex offender. I said yes, that’s my wife! He went over to the passenger side window and asked my wife if she knew I was a sex offender. Long story short, he gave me a speeding ticket and threatened to put me in jail if I told him any lie. This was in texas.

@TXSO4Life: 20/20 hindsight answer is: “I don’t answer questions nor submit to interrogation without legal counsel present.” While one normally tries to be kind to a LEO to try to get out of a ticket, they moment he asked that question, he was locked in on you. It just reinforces the concept that one (RC or not) should *never* answer questions from a LEO. Nothing beyond the legally required bare minimum. P.S. Speeding tickets go unchallenged 95% of the time. Of the 5% challenged in court, 50% of the time the officer doesn’t appear, and the case gets dismissed. Bonus… Read more »

Or simply say “Sorry, but I don’t give interviews.” The fewer words you say, the better. If it gets hostile beyond that tell them to please contact your lawyer and provide them with the name of an actual lawyer. In that case, you will have needed to identify a lawyer ahead of time and remembered their name. Beyond that, and if they become even more hostile, you could say: “I’ll be happy to talk with you if my lawyer agrees to it.” Most lawyers, of course, would never recommend offering statements to the police. You should say absolutely nothing beyond… Read more »

It would make much more sense to have a DUI/DWI scarlet letter and have the officer ask your passenger, “Do you know the driver has been convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol?”.

But hey…that’s never going to happen. Until it does because sex offender court cases are setting precedent for other crimes as well. All we need is the majority of legislature to not have DUI records. Oh..ok…maybe it won’t ever happen after all. My bad.

Here we see the same tried and predictable “arguments” from the local authorities attempting to defend something that’s already on the wrong side of history future-tense. “It’s for public safety, vulnerable citizens, we have to keep tabs on these people, it’s just a matter of time before they re-offend, parents have a right to know where these people live, it’s being proactive, it aides and assists law enforcement..” Ad Infinitum.. Blah blah blah.. I can see how all these local cops with their “sex offender units” can devlop a false sense of pride with their savior complexes and altruistic notions,… Read more »

(“Sexual offenses are invasive, can be violent and can cause victims lifelong trauma. Depression, substance abuse, suicide, PTSD and an array of other psychological disorders have all been linked to sexual victimization. That’s different, Garner said, from, say, auto thefts.”) I guess robberies, shootings, stabbings, non sexual assaults, getting hit and severely injured by a drunk driver, being taken hostage at knifepoint or gunpoint, etc are basically harmless. (“In part it’s because so many children are victims of sex crimes, and parents need to protect their children,” she said. “It’s about protection of people who are vulnerable.”) Wait a minute,… Read more »

Well, you’ve got to get with the rhetorical program. “Sexually violent predators,” as I’ve discussed here recently, has a non-intuitive meaning under California, as well as under all other states’ and federal, laws. “Violence” does not necessarily mean violence in the way reasonable people understand the term and “predator” doesn’t mean what we think of as “predatory,” either. These terms got re-defined, ages ago, by victimist theoreticians who needed reality to more closely align with their febrile boogie-man fantasies with which they had been indoctrinating the public for the past thirty or more years and who, alone were consulted in… Read more »

PIGS came out about a month ago (SDSO San Diego Sheriff’s Office) I told the guy yea im here and what you are doing is called HARASSMENT im not on PAROLE, he rattled of some bullsh*t about it is in the law they can come out blah blah blah…. I said NOPE it isnt in the 290 code (CA) he didnt have anything further to say… Question for anyone: At the FENCE at the ROAD Level i do have a sign that says NO TRESPASSING PRIVATE PROPERTY… even knowing it is a UN-GATED Driveway can they legally come PAST that… Read more »

michael: Next time they say it’s in the law, ask them for the statute. If they stammer and stumble, you can then toss the “it’s not in 290” at them. As for their entering your curtilage (legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/curtilage ) despite the signage, yes they can do that–within reason. They cannot just willy-nilly wander onto people’s property, but if they have a defensible reason for their presence–including performing administrative functions on behalf of the State–they can do it. That they went to others’ homes chips away a bit at any claim of administrative tasks, and rises more to a reasonable suspicion investigation.… Read more »

22
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.