ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Nov 21, Dec 19 – Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings 2020 (Phone only)

National

Fight Against Mugshot Sites Brings Little Success

[pewtrusts.org]

Mike Anderson was an 18-year-old freshman at Texas State University when he was busted with less than a gram of weed. Police arrested him, took his mugshot, and he spent the night in jail.

The legal consequences for being caught with such a small amount of marijuana — just enough for a joint or two — were minimal, but expensive. Prosecutors offered to drop the charges if he attended a drug program and did community service, and he could later get the record of his arrest expunged for about $500, wiping the history of his arrest from public view.

“After I got it expunged I thought it was pretty much a done deal,” he said of the order granted earlier this year.

But the next time he Googled his name, he realized the ordeal was far from over. His arrest photo was posted on Mugshots.com. The page was one of the top results for anyone who might be looking for him. And as Anderson applied for internships — a graduation requirement for mechanical engineering majors — recruiters who initially seemed interested would offer the spot to someone else.

“It wasn’t right,” said Anderson, a junior, who asked that his real name not be used for fear of drawing further attention to his mugshot.

“I called [Mugshots.com] on the phone, and they told me basically the only way I could get the mugshot to come down was to pay a certain fine. Proof of expunction wasn’t valid.”

Read more

 

Join the discussion

  1. JohnDoeUtah

    They may have legal recourse to sue the company denying employment, or firing. When you sign the release for a background check, you are consenting that it only be done with a registered Credit Reporting Agency (CRA), mugshots.com or google.com, are not CRAs under the law. Thus, it is improper, breach of contract, borderline illegal to make a job determination from sources other than a CRA. If Mugshots won’t go away, make it so companies can’t use them for employment actions.

  2. New Person

    The only way to bring around change is through the pockets.

  3. Հակեր

    I’ve discovered the best defense against these sites, is to “pollute the information,” to the point the posted information becomes unbelievable. Many sites give visitors the opportunity to contribute additional information. In my case, certain sites now list me as a disabled, tatted, transgendered, bearded, female.

  4. Michael

    Nothing stopping a state legislature from passing laws requiring ISPs to block access to offending websites to prevent residents of the state from accessing the mug shots. Sites like Mughsots.com would have to accept the fact that less people are going to have access to it’s site, or remove mugshots.

    • AJ

      Wouldn’t that be an unconstitutional regulation of interstate commerce, a power which is delegated solely to Congress?

      • http404

        I think that would be unconstitutional if a law were passed, but consider this… Net Neutrality was canned by the FCC so theoretically there is nothing stopping ISPs from blocking these sites on their own accord.

  5. Tired of this

    Google and other search engines could be persuaded to de-list/de-rank sites like mugshots.com. This appears to have happened to that sex offender mugshot site operated by that fine upstanding gentleman in Arizona, as my listing on that site (which I won’t mention) no longer appears in a Google search of my name. Starve these sites of traffic and I think they’ll wither away like weeds.

    My listing on mugshots.com still ranks as a top result if someone queries my name, despite it being recently made illegal to host a California mugshot for commercial gain (and I, of course, will never pay them a dime). Slimy f***ing weasels.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

.