ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings
ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18, 2021


CT: Sentencing Commission Forwards Two Recommendations, Hit Pause On More Bail Changes


HARTFORD, CT — A proposal that would allow some on the sex offender registry to petition to shorten their registration period or apply for removal from the registry was unanimously approved Thursday by the Sentencing Commission.

The Sentencing Commission also approved recommending reducing misdemeanor sentencing from 365 days to 364 days. That one day would give immigration judges more discretion in deportation hearings. They decided to continue to study the issue of a constitutional amendment on pre-trial release and detention that would deny release to high-risk defendants and deny detention for lack of funds to secure a bail bond.

The commission’s recommendations will be forwarded to Gov. Dannel P. Malloy and the General Assembly for the start of the 2018 legislative session.

On the sex registry proposal, it would give those on the registry an opportunity to petition to shorten their registration period or apply for removal from the public registry. In order to do so the registrant would have to show that they have reduced their risk to the community.

Under the recommendation a person could be on the registry for shorter periods than under the current system, and others would be on for longer periods.

In order to petition the registrant would have to show that they have reduced their risk to the community. Under the new system a person could be on the registry for shorter periods than under the current system, and others would be on for longer periods.

Thomas Ullman, a former public defender from New Haven, said it was a “good proposal.”

Read more


The REPORT, recommendations are on pages 5-14.
Connecticut Sentencing Commission–A Study of the Sex Offender Sentencing, Registration, and Management System – December 2017

Power Point summary of report and recommendations, Oct. 13, 2017

Connecticut for One Standard of Justice | Dec. 11, 2017
Comments submitted by Connecticut for One Standard of Justice, Inc. on proposed Reform of the Sex Offender Registry and other recommendations of the Special Committee on Sex Offenders: This has been an incredibly short sighted and missed opportunity to bring science to bear on sex offender policy that would save Connecticut money, lower recidivism rates, reduce sexual violence and more closely conform state policy to what victims both want and need. MORE:

Connecticut Sentencing Commission, Special Committee on Sex Offenders – member list, meeting minutes, background information and other materials

Connecticut Sentencing Commission, Special Committee on Sex Offenders – 2016 Interim Report

Assessment, Treatment, and Risk Management of Persons Who have Sexually Offended: A Report to the Connecticut Sentencing Commission—June 22, 2017

Connecticut Sentencing Commission, Special Committee on Sex Offenders: Public Hearing on the Registration, Management and Sentencing of Sex Offenders – Jan. 25, 2017
Information and written testimony:

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

From the PDF provided above: ============ The court may order an offender’s removal from the registry if, in the opinion of the court, such removal shall assist the offender in reintegration into the community and shall be consistent with public safety. In making this determination, the court shall consider the nature of the offense and the petitioner’s conduct since the offense, including (1) the offender’s history of sex offender and/or behavioral health treatment; (2) the results of any relevant risk assessments and evaluations by behavioral health professionals; (3) the offender’s history of employment and education; (4) the offender’s compliance with… Read more »

I smell a veto on tap. The governor will veto this otherwise commonsense, constitution-compliant bill to gain political cred, because if he signs the bill the opponents will instantly brand him as a “pedophile lover.” Let’s see what happens.

This strikes me as empty ordinance, unless it also requires the judge to personally articulate his reasoning. Few judges write their own rulings, orders, or opinions and those that do only do so very rarely. Regardless of the law, most judges will not look past the petitioner’s status as a sex offender beyond the charge(s) of conviction and will not be persuaded no matter how strong the case and rubber stamp the DA’s Xeroxed (as in duplicated from all other such petitions, the only difference being the petitioner’s name and case number) denial order. The only answer is to get… Read more »

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x