ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings
ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18, 2021


CT: Mother of victims wants schools to know if students are sex offenders


A New Fairfield mother who said her daughters were sexually assaulted by a family friend is pushing for a law that would require the state to notify a school superintendent when a juvenile who lives in the district and will enroll in school there is a convicted sexual offender.

“We have all seen the horrible and tragic events that are unfolding too often in school settings, when children with mental health issues are not given the help and attention they need,” said the woman, whose name is being withheld to protect the identity of her children. “This bill can make real, positive change by giving our school administrators critical information to keep all our kids safe.”

The bill before the Judiciary Committee would require the state to begin notifying superintendents by Oct. 1, 2018. It would then require the state Commissioner of Education and the Judicial Branch to develop a model policy by Jan. 1, 2019 that would assist the juvenile sex offender in the school setting, ensure the safety and well-being of victims and dictate with whom a superintendent may share the information. The mother said the bill was introduced by her district’s state senator, Michael A. McLachlan, R-Danbury, who is vice chairman of the Judiciary Committee.

Read more


We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

A woman who suffered an unthinkable betrayal from a trusted friend takes her anger out on those who had nothing to do with the atrocity. How does attacking people who have already been punished prevent attacks from the one’s you trust?

A person that just wants to know if that individual is “sex offender” just because they have a right to know and then justify the reason of keeping safe from someone they don’t know has no reason at all other then the intention of doing harm. The registry and all its ordinances should be abolished.

No one has a right to know. If they did then everyone would have the right to know their neighbor shot his last neighbor. I would also have a right to know if my neighbor broke into his last neighbor’s home and beat the whole family nearly to death. I would have the right to know about all dangerous crimes. But obviously we don’t have those rights.

There is clearly no right to know. The fact that the criminal regimes and their terrorist supporters refuse to follow that makes them criminal harassers and combatants in declared war.

Hold the phone! The daughter saw the 14yo boy with another girl at school, then claims foul. Does this not sound like she was pissed off at him for being with another girl and came up with “I’ll get you”?
Make false allegation to mom, then “mom” runs with it while daughter just sits back?
The story does not give the specifics which leads to make one wonder.

The SEX Offender Registries are an act of war. I don’t care who supports them or why. They are not Americans. F them.

If you don’t learn from history, then it’s bound to repeat itself. Essentially, the mom is forcing any juvenile sex offender to wear “the Scarlett letter”. Again, in this day and age, no one believes the past can occur in today’s age. Any registrant who’s completed their punishment custody service to the state is still forced to do custody service to the state under the registration system. Compelling a free citizen to do any work against their will under penalty of law is involuntary servitude. The frequency doesn’t matter. Whether you’re forced to check-in once a month or once a… Read more »

So identify the people who support the harassment and make them pay. Follow all laws, but do unto others as they would do unto you. It is easier than people think.

People are so delusional in believing that “sex offenders”are incurable, and that they cannot be helped and be forgiven all because of the lies about being in danger and registrants having to endure great hardships and libel accusations and lies that are being twisted into the truth. But a lie becomes the truth to only the person that wants to believe it.

With it being SOOOO easy to run a foul as a sex offender, this woman’s own daughter can very easily on the one on the list.

“A New Fairfield mother who said her daughters were sexually assaulted by a family friend (14 yr old boy)…”

Another statistical reference point that fits the 90-95% of those who know who committed an act against them vs who are strangers.

I want to know if any mothers that go near my child’s school smoke marijuana, smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol, have speeding tickets, DUI, area on any mood altering meds, have been promiscuous, have any criminal accusations at all, or been divorced more than twice. I mean, I really don’t want this type of mother anywhere near my kids, as you never know if she might subject my child to any of those things, so please, the school should notify all parents and give a full disclosure of every mother’s past. Thank you.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x