ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: September 21 – Phone meeting details

Emotional Support Group Meetings (Los Angeles, Sacramento, Phone)

General News

Why Should Feminists Be Against the Sex Offender Registry?

In October, the Supreme Court heard a case that was painfully ironic, considering the Kavanaugh hearings the nation had just been subjected to: a challenge to the United States’ extremely restrictive sex offender registry laws.

While opinions on the case Gundy v. United States, which challenges the Attorney General’s ability to retroactively impose registry requirements, have yet to come out, debate around sex offender registries is particularly important in the wake of #metoo.

Established in the ‘90s following several high-profile rapes and murders of children, the sex offender registry used parental grief to propagate “tough on crime” policies. Registries were initially framed as mechanisms to protect children from sexual abuse by imposing severe and often lifelong housing, work, and even internet restrictions on people found guilty of sexual violence. The public nature of the registry was intended to help parents protect their children against “sexual predators” in their communities. Today, sex offender registries include people convicted of a wide range of sex-related offenses and even some non-sexual ones, from public urination to rape. Full Opinion Piece

Related

Gorsuch Challenges Blank Check for the U.S. Attorney General

Join the discussion

  1. Jack

    I know the radical feminists will always be for the sex offender registry. The liberal ones on the other hand, I’m not so sure about.

    • Harry

      Feinstein, Hillary and Harris naming a few are hardcore pro registry.

      • Jack

        Hey harry did you notice how feministing’s based out of San Francisco? I’m pretty sure Ms. Harris is from there too. Liberal feminism seems to be vogue there after all.

    • td777

      Your comment was a little odd considering the current version of feminism and liberalism pretty much go hand in hand…

      • Jack Thompson

        You have no clue what you’re talking about Timm. There’s two types of feminists actually. There’s liberal vs radical. The radicals are fundamentally the enemy here.

        • Notorious D.I.K. / Kennerly

          The more useful distinction between feminists is “equity feminist” vs. “gender feminist” with gender feminists being the type who really do hate men and, for that matter, sex.

        • TS

          Recommend peeps here watch “The Red Pill” to understand the gender feminist movement as NDIK states and how it counters the men’s rights movement. You can find more online about it as well as through various media outlets, e.g. TEDx Talk on YT, and probably your local library where I checked it out to watch.

  2. Tim Moore

    Frick… We have allies where we thought we had only enemies. Great! There are also Christians, libertarians and conservatives who have some sense and see the registries as counterproductive. Why are you guys looking for more ways for us to isolate ourselves even more? You think we are so powerful, we don’t need allies?

  3. Henry

    I agree. Feminists are our GREATEST allies. In the #MeToo movement, feminists opinions get the attention of all women. They (the feminists) are an educated group of society and knowing that the registry does not work to keep people safe is an excellent tactic to chip away the support people have for it.

    Our greatest enemy is the “lack of truth” about how the registry is absolutely useless and keeps no one safe.

  4. Jack

    Sorry TD*

  5. Jack

    Just in case anybody is interested in learning how gender feminists IE radical feminists think, they might want to read feminist current. It offers wonderful insight into the politics of sexual authoritarianism.

  6. Dustin

    Good points in the source article. Wish I had seen it before the comments thread closed. My only real disagreement is its suggestion that the registry is pushed and exacerbated by conservatives – completely untrue. First, it was Clinton and the Democrats in Congress that enacted Megan’s law. Second, the registry and associated restrictions (until recently) have always been vigorously supported by all politicians, most seeking to outdo the others, regardless of party or political leanings.

    That said, it is positive that any feminists are looking at the registry logically as opposed to emotionally, even though many still somehow think it’s not harsh enough.

    • Registerednotoffender

      Actually in smith v. Doe it was the liberal justices such as Breyer and RGB who found the registry violates ex facto. All the conservative judges upheld it as constitutional.

  7. Jack

    Dustin, the author of the megan’s law bill was a republican.

    • Dustin

      @ Jack,

      It was a Republican in the New Jersey legislature that wrote and named the first version of Megan’s law, but the federal version was written and passed by the Democrat-controlled Congress and signed into law by Clinton. Apologies for the confusion.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer this question to prove that you are not a robot *

.