ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings


CA: CA Democrats Author Bill to Protect Sex Offenders Who Lure Minors

State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblywoman Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) introduced recent legislation “to end blatant discrimination against LGBT young people regarding California’s sex offender registry.”

However, under their bill, SB 145, the offenders would not have to automatically register as sex offenders if the offenders are within 10 years of age of the minor. Full Article

Also see

Join the discussion

  1. USA

    Uh. So, if your a 25 year old man and you have anal sex with a 15 year old, you don’t go on the registry? I personally don’t care about the LGBT group! What about heterosexuals? What’s the difference? Crazy Ca

    • Bob

      So, would that apply to those possessing cp within 10 years of their age?

    • cool RC CA

      “Crazy Ca”

      Yes your right ! CA was the 1st state that started all this mess.
      correct me if I m wrong.

    • AO

      This bill gives the judge the ability to not have someone register. It doesn’t make it automatic to not register. Mandatory sentencing is bad as it forces judges to treat everyone 100% the same despite having wildly different circumstances from case to case. I doubt many judges would not levy registration against a 22-year-old who tried/did hook up with a 12 year old. But they’re less likely to make some register if it’s a 19-year-old with a 16 or 17 year old victim.

      • Joe

        a 19-year-old with a 16 or 17 year old victim…

        me thinks you forgot to put quotes around “16 or 17 year old victim”. What a strange place this is. Seriously!

    • David

      “Offenders who lure minors”
      Now there’s a fake news headline.

    • New York Level 1

      In addition to it’s other evils, the registry is homo- and trans-phobic.

      Most well known is Static 99-R, which rates you as more dangerous if you are a man with a male victim instead of or in addition to a female victim.

      In regards to this article: sex with a minor within 10 years of your age is illegal. If you have vaginal sex with the minor, it’s illegal but doesn’t trigger registration.

      However, if you have non-vaginal sex with the minor (presumably of any gender), that DOES trigger registration.

      That’s discriminatory against LGBT people who are not interested in or not able to have vaginal sex. It says “the type of sex you have is morally worse than vaginal sex”.

      Of course hetero people get caught in the dragnet too, so long as theyre having other-than-vaginal sex.

      • Will Allen

        I know very little about the Static 99-R and that it is very controversial. Not looking to start another war here about it but have people considered that it might just be factually useful? I know a few people have mentioned that.

        What I mean is – is it like insurance is where they do strictly a cause/effect relationship? For example, they say, “if the person has/does/is X, then that person costs N more money” and it doesn’t matter at all what X is. All the insurance company knows is that it is a provable fact that people with X cost N more. Maybe X is “owns 2 dogs”. Doesn’t matter.

        Could it be that the Static 99-R questions that you perceive to be homophobic are strictly known casual/risk factors? You don’t even need to respond, I’m just throwing it out there for thought.

        • RegistrantNotAnOffender

          My therapist said people whose victim are of the same sex typically have way more victims but I bet there are plenty of people on this site who could dispute that.

  2. AERO1

    It’s funny how the people who wright this shiit try so hard to sound Kool.They have no remorse for putting out fake news till it’s one of there love ones that has to register for life then there like “thats bull shiit my son’s a good kid” and anouther thing I’ve noticed is now that the Me Too Movement has come out people have changed there minds about RC’s
    beacus artcalss like this had people beleveing people who comment sex crimes we’re onley creepy men with glasses on sitting behind a computer now with all these famous people being called out everybody is starting to see how lame Megan’s Law is at the time when it came out it made since but times have changed and everybody knows the regersty is useless as hell and far as the LGBTQ I could care less I just hope it passes for the people who’s life this could save from haveing to register for life straight or gay …

    • bob

      Im one screwed by the lame static 99… lets see… im gay, so called victim (17.5 consensual)…also gay…. but I get a point because my so called victim was a male…. wtf

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *