ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (07/23 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

ACSOL Conference Oct 1, 2022 


General News

Remove Children from Sex-Offender Registries

There are good reasons to reconsider some aspects of the 1994 Crime Bill, because we’ve had a chance to see the unintended consequences.

One feature of the 1994 law that has had baleful unanticipated effects was the adoption of sex-offender registries. At the time, experts advised that sex offenders never reformed. To protect the community from those found guilty of such offenses after their return to society, registries would require them to identify themselves (sometimes even with signs in their windows). Understandably, penalties were particularly harsh for anyone who harmed a child sexually.

What the law’s authors didn’t anticipate is that children themselves would be caught up in this net. The Juvenile Law Center in Philadelphia has been studying those effects. Full Opinion Piece


We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

OMNIBUS94 is getting some attention by media lately. Too bad the electronic die has already been cast. 1994 was the year the people decided to begin enslaving ( evil) humans to databases and their maintenance. The data mandated, by law, is personal information concerning the day to day whereabouts and doings of individuals, family and associates, all stored and available for use, by whoever, or what ever. Simply put, a market feature is the widespread availability of personal information as a commodity.

Not an easy idea to SELL in the 90s but BIG brother found a way. Once again the author reaches to rescue kids, but this time not from the offender but from the database itself.
Kinda makes me shake my head in confusion as no doubt she still applauded the core concept that some( so evil) humans MUST be made subservient because it is NEEDED. She still erroneously believes our leadership was thinking about kids. Nothing could be further from the truth and indentured kids are proof enough it was about the machine and it’s potential uses. ” Something else afoot! ” Indeed.

Apparently comments on the article is restricted to subscribers. Some thoughts nevertheless….

“Should a youthful offense or stupid mistake carry a lifetime punishment?” – Should ANY offense or stupid mistake carry a lifetime punishment? Other than, say, murder? And yay for the “punishment” part 🙂

“Children who have been labeled sex offenders often struggle to lead normal lives after serving time.” – ANYONE who has been labeled sex offenders often struggle to lead normal lives after serving time. Or completed probation – as their offense was so terrible it warranted zero incarceration.

“But surely some of the injustices — like imposing lifelong pariah status on children — cry out for correction.” – But surely some of the injustices — like imposing lifelong pariah status on those convicted of an arbitrary type of crime — cry out for correction. Why don’t they?

Why is any of this deemed only applicable to minors?

Wait – what am I missing again? The article is questioning whether children should suffer from this “punishment ” for the rest of their lives. I thought the registry wasn’t punishment and only administrative? I am confused!

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x