ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings


CO: Divided state Supreme Court ruling allows convicted man to terminate sex offender registration

[ – 5/19/20]

In a 4-3 decision, the Colorado Supreme Court has ruled that a criminal defendant was entitled to his request to de-register as a sex offender because he completed the terms of his probationary sentence and therefore no longer had a conviction under the law.

Brian Keith McCulley pleaded guilty in 2000 to two counts of sexual assault. One of the charges, a misdemeanor, resulted in 60 days in jail while the other, a felony, carried a deferred judgment. In Colorado, deferred judgments allow for completion of probation lasting a period of months to years. If the defendant satisfies the conditions of probation, the court dismisses the case.

For his felony, McCulley had to serve four years on probation and register as a sex offender. In 2004, he completed the probation and a judge withdrew McCulley’s guilty plea and dismissed the charge against him.

Years later, in 2016, McCulley petitioned to de-register as a sex offender. The Colorado Sex Offender Registration Act prevents someone who has more than one conviction from requesting such a discontinuation. Prosecutors argued that the law included the deferred judgment as a “conviction,” even though McCulley countered that his record, as it stood, only included one misdemeanor sex crime conviction.

A district court agreed with the prosecution, claiming that the “legislative intent” of the law was to bar even those with deferred sentences from de-registering in the state’s offender tracking system. The Colorado Court of Appeals also reached the same conclusion.

Read the full article

Download the decision:

Colorado Supreme Court allows convicted man to terminate sex offender registration 5-18-20 2020-18sc577

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“Justice Brian D. Boatright looked to the same clause about defendants who “received a deferred judgment and sentence” and reached the opposite conclusion: the law did not mention those with completed sentences because it did not envision special treatment for them.” Why would it need to specifically mention it if to a layman having no conviction via dismissal and SORA talking about a “conviction” would have SORA nothing to look at at that point? CA very specifically added an amendment to neuter our dismissal (1203.4). But I do wonder how the new tiered registry will interact with our 1203.4? 1203.4… Read more »

I hope this kind of outcome comes to Texas at some point

Sheeesh.! So, glad the lower scum courts lost ! Or we the people would be screwed again for garbage legal Uh ozzeez did not mean to punish and punish and punish at every angle and level and aspect of the defendants life … Were just doing our job to protect ! If you, i or anyone in this crap hole of a democratic Gov. In and on our job caused liss of liberty, put lives in danger, caused unthinkable hell and deprivations and restraints etc. UNINTENTIONALLY NO MATTER HOW NOBLE WE MAY BE “WE WOULD BE ACCOUNTABLE, LIABLE AND CHARGED… Read more »

Absolutely right! The Texas deferred adjudication scam needs to end. and end now. Since its not a conviction and dismissed by the court. Why do we need to register lifetime? Makes no sense. We need to get Janice and Richard Gladden on this problem. There are thousands of registered citizens in Texas that have had deferred adjudication probation and successfully completed it but are still required to register lifetime. I am one of those and also am classified as low risk. I hope this court case will set the stage for better things to come.

What kind of headline is that?? We won.

Maybe now Colorado will get off its ass and rule on the “Judge Matsch Case”. I call it that because I don’t know the actual name of the case. But I’m sure most know what I’m referring to.


Millard v Rankin is the Judge Matsch decision from CO you’re thinking of.

I don’t know if this case here would help the decision but the recent PA decision could.


Thank you for citing the case.
I hope Judge Matsch’s decision is upheld. I agree that with the events in PA and maybe even the events in Michigan – hopefully these courts can see the writing on the wall.

Change I liked that about writings on the wall from Daniel. Yes it is time for a change in a lot of this justice system.. I see Tim brought up Deferred prosecution and yes they can and will try to adjucate one either before, during, or after. In my case they come to me to sign a paper after completion of my registry classes saying I knew I was talking to a teenager and yes that was my PO. My sister said to me might as well go ahead and sign it you’ve signed everything else, I didn’t sign it… Read more »

Deferred prosecution is just another play from the book of the prosecutor. An offer of deferred prosecution was made to me in 1991. I rejected the offer immediately, I knew wasn’t guilty. As you can see in this case, the prosecutorial ploy is used to manipulate the defendant in bad faith. If one enters into a deferred prosecution agreement the defendant is still required to admit capability as part of it, and indeed sign away rights and privileges. Doing so limits the defense by collateral implication to direct and indirect appeals. What state’s prosecutors are really after is a volunteered… Read more »

I would like to know if anyone were able to get off probation early on deferred adjudication? did you serve half your time?

I’m glad someone is using wisdom today or if anyone knows wisdom or do we all learn and yes even judges. Seems like things are getting deep in America since this pandermic. Image a women scientist being fired for distorting data. One wonders who’s distorting the truth in many of these offender ordeals or should we all go back to the Serenity Prayer. I made a coment on here about the telegraph and the first message sent. What has God wrought and it seemed to go over everybodys head. One wonders if we are all being a bit cynical or… Read more »

There should be a point of termination from being on the sex offense registry, so that individuals that are no longer on it can live their lives freely and unmolested, because it’s a waste of time to just keep them tracked and notified for long periods of time like that, which is just pointless and does more harm than good. The people that want to keep the registry going indefinitely just because they want them to comply may be the problem because they don’t want to let go and usually seek vengeance instead of seeking help.

this —–> However, once he completes the terms of his sentence, he is no longer “convicted.”

That is exactly the mindset we need

I believe this will be my last post for a while so listen up! OK Evey one of you all need a “Timeout”. I mentioned to A.D.A.T. and Will to report to the principals office but it is I that needs to report also. Yes after hearing some of Russ ordeal it saddens me. Seems like each one on here is a brain factory. Wanting to solve a “One trick pony” number in this Monty Hall “Lets make a deal”. Now heres is the reason I came back on here. While I was hoping for a pardon I had sent… Read more »

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x