ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Nov 21, Dec 19 – Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings 2020 (Phone only)

ACSOL NewsCalifornia

ACSOL Challenges Irvine’s Presence Restrictions in CA

The Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws (ACSOL) today filed a lawsuit challenging presence restrictions in the City of Irvine which were declared to be preempted by state law six years ago.  Today’s lawsuit was filed after repeated requests by ACSOL to repeal the unlawful restrictions including a letter sent to the city dated February 13, 2020.

“The City of Irvine has acted unlawfully for the past six years by continuing to require some registrants to obtain prior written approval before entering a public park,” stated ACSOL President Chance Oberstein.  “This is particularly egregious because an appellate court has already ruled that the city’s restrictions are preempted by state law.”

In its decision, the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Three, upheld the right of a registrant to use the city’s tennis courts without first obtaining written permission from the city’s police chief to do so.  In its ruling, the court noted that state law “regulate[s] numerous aspects of a sex offender’s life,” including “the places a sex offender may visit,” “the people with whom he or she may interact,” “where and with whom a sex offender may reside,” the duty to inform law enforcement of numerous facts, “law enforcement’s ability to track a sex offender,” “what sorts of jobs or volunteer positions a sex offender may accept,” and “the public and private places a sex offender may visit.”

The Court further noted that, “although the Penal Code does not include a provision identical to the restrictions Irvine section 4-14-803 imposed on all sex offenders entering a public park where children regularly gather, it does include several sections prohibiting or limiting a sex offender’s ability to visit many public and private places where children regularly gather.”  In light of the scope and number of the state laws governing Registrants, the Court ruled that the state’s “comprehensive and standardized scheme for regulating sex offenders” established a “complete system for regulating a sex offender’s daily life [that] manifested a legislative intent to fully occupy the field to the exclusion of Irvine section 4-14-803 and other local regulations.”

In the past, ACSOL filed a total of 32 lawsuits challenging presence restrictions in California cities and counties.  As the result of those lawsuits, a total of 79 cities and counties repealed their presence restrictions.

“The only known remaining presence restrictions for registrants not on parole or probation in the state of California are those adopted by the City of Irvine,” stated ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci.  “It is clear that Irvine’s restrictions are unlawful and therefore ACSOL challenged them today.”

Download PDF of People v. Nguyen_ 222 Cal. App. 4th 1168

 

Join the discussion

  1. SR

    That’s great! Get them!

    I’m amazed this is still a thing. At this point, there should be an automatic penalty to whatever municipality trying to enforce such things. Not like they can claim ignorance.

  2. AERO1

    Irvine voted safest city in America for its size 14 years in a ro they love bring about it so u know sexofender registry restrictions are top on LE list It would be a pleasure to see the city of Irvine repeal their sexofender restrictions..

    Good luck

  3. G4Change

    As always, good luck, and thank you Janice, Chance, and all for all you do!

  4. Jack

    That’s Orange County for you. Bunch of right wing nazi sympathizers. Give em hell Janice.

  5. Bill

    Instead of taking on REAL problems like police brutality and Covid-19 Irvine takes on BS issues to create the false sense of safety.

    I’m glad Janice and Chance are taking Irvine on. Go get em!

  6. GN

    Thank you team ACSOL! I’ve been avoiding Irvine… Best wishes and I hope we can go to a concert within the Great Park soon!

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

.