ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (4/17 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings
ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18, 2021

Commentary

Maxwell Monty: When Objectivity is not the Objective

When objectivity is not the objective, the ultimate judgment is anyone’s guess. For those who have traveled down a lengthy rabbit hole doubling as a discussion on social media, it is known that more times than not the net result is a lot of subjective thinking; a lot of hyperbolic venting; and a lot of deconstructive fulminating. For each assertion of rational thought there are myriad baseless proclamations. (Read Lisa Anne Zilney’s article, “Guilt by Association: Labeling Research-Based Policy Suggestions as ‘Pro-Offender” for proof of that.) And while that can be frustrating, it’s tolerable because the objective (and expectation) of posting online is to unpack cathartic contemplation and knee-jerk vitriol; hence the prevailing comment that social media posts tend to transform into a cesspool of unmitigated tantrums. But fundamentality there is no tangible infection of society born out of that sump because laws and judgments are not rendered from that ultra-impassioned platform.
Politicians and judges, because of the significance of their decisions, are trusted to demonstrate limited emotion when making determinations that are intended to provide fairness for everyone. That does not mean that those individuals need to be robots; but they must utilize a rational line of thinking when legislating and judging. To do otherwise is a violation of the very order they intend to create and uphold.

There is certainly a place for visceral orations: electrifying pregame exhortations, compelling religious sermons and dynamic motivational speeches serve an invaluable function and certainly can promote inspiration and achievement. But emotional energy on its own becomes dangerous when it is repeatedly stoked back to life. Endurance is the ultimate catalyst in the pursuit of victory; and endurance is a combination of intrinsic energy with unflagging logic. My high school baseball coach advised me “to fight every battle with passion and reason; and when you find the proper balance between those two ingredients the final product will be credible, and worthy of distinction.” And credibility is sought from those that create the laws and those that uphold them.

Unfortunately, of late, there is evidence that flagrant emotions from social media are dictating the verdicts asserted by supposed objective arbiters. And when findings are delivered with demonstrative and detached zeal, they are quickly digested by the salivating media and general population. And when comments that go beyond the appropriate scope are so obviously personal, it shifts that decision from the necessarily innocuous objective to the potentially harmful subjective. And suddenly social media commentary is fueled and becomes a tail-wagger of the dog. This is particularly toxic regarding the treatment of sex crimes and those accused and/or convicted of those offenses.

In a sexual assault case involving a gymnastics coach, the judge rendered a sentence of 40-175 years. But the vindictive fashion in which the sentence was revealed possibly paved the way for future judgments to be swayed towards onerous retributions that are unreasonable. The judge said, “I do not think that you should ever leave jail and do not believe that you can be rehabilitated. It is my honor and privilege to sentence you. I just signed your death warrant.” At the completion of the judge’s extended and fiery commentary, most of the individuals in the courtroom exploded with applause.

Regardless of the elements of a case, no matter the nature of the acts that were committed by the convicted individual, the judge must maintain decorum and provide an objective decision that is devoid of fomenting emotion. Failing that, the judge is no better than the individual who unleashes a feverish and unfounded post on social media.

It is unquestionably important in a democracy that judges and politicians, as a whole, are impartial and independent of all external influences; this conduct provides a calm sense of reason and a longstanding degree of trust with society. And for those principles it is imperative upon us to fight with unrelenting stamina and unwavering rationale while demanding uncompromised fairness. For when Objectivity is ushered out and Subjectivity grabs the reins, welcome to the Wild, Wild “Guess.”

– Maxwell Monty

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I always believed that a judge was to be fair and impartial. In being so that would level the playing field and give a defendant a fair trial. It is sad when I judge takes a side which the judge in the above sexual assault case clearly did. It should put doubt in minds as to whether or not the defendant received a fair trial. Unfortunately, as so many times have shown will lead to applause which I also thought was not allowed in a court of law.

Until the courts accept the truthfulness of their use of false data with respect to recidivism rates was from a Psychology Today magazine, then objectiveness will never be seen through registrant eyes. It is within the “frightening and high” recidivism rates of 80% or more which deemed all who registry as irredeemable. No other convict class is subjected to involuntary servitude beyond their custodial term. For most of the convict class the ideology is people make mistakes. For the sex convict class the ideology is only monsters make these mistakes. Thus, the dichotomy of objectivity by the courts. In my… Read more »

@ New Person. Actually myself I wasn’t not into all that statistic’s and percentages of all this recidivism rates in this in much of sex offender game/issue. I even studied that in criminal justice classes with many other issues of that time when I was in my studies, I took the course at a two year community when dad was still living. Didn’t like Marshall University and couldn’t get into that scene. Had to go thru all or a lot of that stuff when I got busted a little bit myself back in that 70’s period and it is sort… Read more »

Brock Turner’s judge followed the Law and got recalled; while Larry Nassar’s judge ran a circus and got praised. Government wins, Constitution loses!!

You know dads in all have their work cut out for them Dad came from a family of 12. He was always interested in football. Played a bit in high school. Are things with this sex registry like a football scrimmage line or defense tackle or a government/uncommon kind. Yes he was also into boxing and yes I can understand the sport of boxing more than football. and yes I have no room to talk when it comes to politics as I didn’t sign up to vote in the first place and if I did at the time nobody would… Read more »

The white man did it!………Objectivity? A word seldom used in comon everyday words Yes getting to the truthmeans a whole lot. I think I mentioned a case my dad was actidently involved in on here way back when. Actually he was not involved in but still it has meaning even today for the truth and all types of criminal matters or issues even with this registry issue we are all going thru. Janice you chance and the team correct me if I am wrong. I mention I believe on ACSOL about the famous Mamie Thurman trial a part of Appalachian… Read more »

I also thought that was such a vindictive sermon/sentence on the part of that judge- courtroom is not a circus and the judge not a clown or a lion-tamer!

7
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.