ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule


ACSOL Urges “NO” on Prop. 20, “YES” on Prop. 17

The Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws (ACSOL) urges registrants, their families and supporters to vote “NO” on Proposition 20 and to vote “YES” on Proposition 17.  Both propositions are included on the November 2020 ballots.

If passed, Proposition 20 would significantly increase the number of violent felonies from 27 to 51, resulting in harsher sentences and longer prison terms.  Of that total, the number of violent sex offenses would also increase significantly from 9 to 14.  In addition, Proposition 20 would require the collection of DNA from individuals convicted of a misdemeanor offense.

According to a report issued by the Center for Juvenile and Criminal Justice, passage of Proposition 20 would cost the state of California more than $450 million a year and cost every county in the state at least $5 million a year.  A chart regarding the cost to each county can be found on pages 14 and 15 of the report.

Proposition 17, if passed, would significantly increase the number of people eligible to vote in future elections by allowing individuals on parole to vote.  Individuals currently on probation are already eligible to vote.

According to statements in the Official Voters Guide, individuals on parole are already allowed to vote in 19 states.  Those who support Proposition 17 have stated that a Florida study found that “people who have completed their prison sentences and had their voting rights restored were less likely to commit crimes in the future.

“Because ACSOL is a non-profit organization recognized by the IRS, it cannot support or oppose any person running for office,” stated ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci.  “The IRS rules, however, allow ACSOL and other non-profit organizations to support or oppose ballot propositions.”


We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
    1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
    2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
    3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
    4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
    5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
    6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
    7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
    8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
    9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
    10. Please do not post in all Caps.
    11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
    12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
    13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
    14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
    15. Please do not solicit funds
    16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
    17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
    18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Exactly how I voted. Dropped my ballot in the mailbox a few days ago.

@C – Thank you for voting early! Thanks you also for voting NO on Prop. 20 and YES on Prop. 17. I have done the same.

We BOTH voted early and dropped.ooff in metal secured City box by the County. Same Janice Yes 17/NO no no on 20.
Thx so much for details of.props and right correct information to make informed decisions

Confused – why are non-profit organizations not allowed to endorse candidates?


IRS code for what keeps an organization legally tax exempt … as to the reasoning behind why they prohibit that … that I will leave to others to speculate on

The reasoning is what I was asking for.

@Dustin – The IRS did not give us a reason. Instead, they gave us a rule: non-profits cannot oppose or support any person running for office. Because we want to maintain our status as a non-profit, we follow that rule.

Roger or higher can respond better Dustin, but no non profit as they are just that, they get governmental tax breaks Fed and State and do not :VOICE opinion for.that reason. Non-profits have advantages over for profit and are advantageous to out communities, most are positive for us. The People.and some stand for.others alike Mothers Against Drunk Driving [i.e., MADD] for.helping and turning after running the org.profits are fed back into the community

That’s what I did and dropped it in the ballot box today. That and every family member in my home…

What about Prop. 25?

– ACSOL has only taken a position and is therefore only making recommendations regarding Propositions 17 and 20.

Thanks Janice

For what it’s worth, I voted no, based on the fact that Prop. 25 would call for probation officers to be assigned to those charged of crimes in lieu of bail. I am not sure that passes constitutional mustard, but no way in hell should anyone have to answer to a p.o. when they haven’t even been convicted of anything yet. I do not assign any evil intent to the writers or backers of Prop. 25, but I do not feel it was well thought out in this regard.

A P.O. or supervision in lieu of bail might not pass Constitutional muster however giving a defendant choice between Bail with conditions / conditional release no bail and Unconditional bail is done in a lot of places and seems to pass because one can choose not to be supervised by paying a higher bail. In practice most take the cheapest option.


When the sisters of Polly Klaas officially come out against Prop 20, there’s hope for the world. The only reason I haven’t voted yet… Dad and I both huge Dodger fans. Dodger Stadium will have polls opening Oct. 30. Will be there to remember him and do my civic duty at the ultimate voting location!

I done did it! Voted as suggested here! 👍😁


Regarding prop 20 –

“In addition, Proposition 20 would require the collection of DNA from individuals convicted of a misdemeanor offense.”

My offense was 24 years ago, misdemeanor 647.6 No jail time, only 3 years probation. While on probation I was forced to provide a DNA swab, stating that the rules changed and even misdemeanor offenders had to provide DNA. Was it illegally obtained from me at that time?

Don’t want to celebrate early but looks like Prop 20 is NO!

Thank God!!!

California Safety and Justice has announced on Twitter that Prop 20 has gone down to defeat! With 55% of the vote counted, the results thus far 68% No, 32% yes.
As for Prop 17, with 55% tabulated, 60% yes, 40% no. Don’t see anyone calling this yet, but looks very promising!

Equality California has officially announced on Twitter that Prop 17 has passed!

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x