ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings

National

ND: Should North Dakota Extend the Statue of Limitations for Prosecuting Sexual Abuse?

[hot975fm.com – 1/5/21]

But three North Dakota lawmakers are working to make sure other victims get the justice they deserve. The lawmakers had been planning bills that would extend the statute of limitations for reporting and prosecuting sex crimes before the Attorney General made his decision. Learn more about the potential bills here.

Read the full article and links to the proposed bills

 

Related:

Lawmakers seek to extend North Dakota statutes of limitation in child sex abuse cases [inforum.com – 1/5/21 – REQUIRES FREE REGISTRATION]

FARGO — Three state legislators, a Republican and two Democrats, aim to revise North Dakota’s statute of limitation laws this legislative session to open up windows of time for survivors of child sex abuse to pursue legal avenues in civil courts.

Rep. Austin Schauer, R-West Fargo, Sen. Kathy Hogan, D-Fargo, and Sen. Tim Mathern, D-Fargo, are working together on bills that would create an “open window” of two years for sexual abuse victims to file a civil lawsuit, and would extend the statute of limitations from three to 10 years for sexual abuse of a minor, Schauer said.

Another bill that Schauer is working on would change state law to start the 10-year clock for a sex abuse survivor to file a claim for relief to begin at the time of consulting an attorney. “The average age when a person comes forward is 52 years old. It takes that long for someone to even think about coming forward to file a civil lawsuit,” he said.

Join the discussion

  1. Dustin

    Laws like the ones proposed leave the doors VERY wide open for false claims. It amazes me that not a single one of the proponents of these initiatives ever see that.

    • Warpath

      Potentially 40 years later? I’m certain the memories would be 100% valid……pfffftttt. It would come down to an accusation that could not be defended. I am all for justice but really? 40 years later? Anything for a reelection vote. Dirt bags

  2. JohnDoeUtah

    Mitchell v Roberts, 2020 UT 34

    Utah found such revisions, even civil, violated due process by divesting vested rights if the SOL has already expired.

    • Dustin @ JohnDoeUtah

      Pretty sure they get around that by extending the SOL.

      • JohnDoeUtah

        Read the ruling, State Supreme Court stated that extending the SOL in that way violates the constitution.

  3. q

    The answer is YES! Especially in Joe Biden’s case!

    …oh wait, rules for thee not for me?

  4. Anonymous

    Sex crimes only? They can’t think of any other crime worthy of same?? Pfffftttt

  5. Brandon

    We all know memories last forever and never fade overtime. I’d imagine hypnosis and other methods stocks will skyrocket, if this goes through. Remember folks false accusations are always real.

    This idea needs to be kicked to the curb now.

  6. David⚜️

    🤔 Extending the statute of limitations on charging crimes enable them to fill more prisons, so sure, why not?? Gotta support that prison-industrial complex, right? 🙄
    (It’s bizarre that one State [North Dakota] is going in one direction, while another State’s [Virginia] crime commission seeks to eliminate mandatory minimums.)

  7. Two States East

    Doesn’t the SCOTUS 2002 decision of California’s Stogner prevail? I think undoing Stogner via SCOTUS rehearing is their real goal. After all Stogner was a close decision.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

.