ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (04/16 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings




MD: Annapolis, MD (KB) Frederick County Delegate Jesse Pippy said he is sponsoring sex offender legislation

[ – 2/9/21]

Annapolis, MD (KB) Frederick County Delegate Jesse Pippy said he is sponsoring five pieces of legislation at the 2021 General Assembly in Annapolis. One has to do with the sex offender registry and expungement.

“There has been a push recently to expunge certain offenses off peoples’ records,” he explained.

Delegate Pippy said this bill will make sure that individuals who are on the sex registry are prohibited from getting their sex offenses expunged.

Read the full article

Bill search



We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This guy is such a douche…

Oh nuts this delegate is in my backyard. Time to make my voice heard loud and clear that I as his constituent I don’t not support this bill. I’ll also ask him what evidence does he have to support his bill. What a douchebag

If legislators are made to back up their legislation with data and projected costs they will be much more constructive. Note that they will begin with the assumption which nearly all their constituents believe and agree with…
1. All sex offenders re-offend at alarming rates. (see doe vs smith) this argument is part of the “proof of worth” of most new legislation.
2. Sex offences are under reported so any low recidivism percentage data is wrong.
3. Even if the legislation is net harmful to society, parents still have a right to know.
4. “Saving just one child” makes it all worthwhile. — no discussion on how many are harmed by the legislation.

The cost of the legislation is not really looked at. If the real costs of these laws were examined realistically many may not pass. If the total costs were common knowledge as is the incorrect assumptions above, a lot of the new legislation may not be proposed and sponsored.

Right….because that’s going to do anything meaningful. I’m not sure how many cases are expunged in Maryland per year let alone sex offenses, but I’d be willing to bet the numbers are low. Maybe he should focus on more useful legislation.

So you can beat and harm someone and go on with your life, but touching a “private” area is grounds for lifetime humiliation………

You know what is next?

A bill will be introduced legalizing ‘Shoot on sight’.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x