ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule

National

TX: Proposed Kyle sex offender law has supporters and opponents

[communityimpact.com – 3/15/21]

Kyle City Council will consider passing a new ordinance which would restrict where some individuals on the Texas sex offender registry can reside, regardless of whether or not the offender is on probation or parole.

The ordinance, brought to council by Kyle Police Chief Jeff Barnett, specifically targets offenders convicted of crimes involving minors. Of the city’s 67 residents on the registry, nine were convicted of minor-related crimes. Kyle does not have the most sex offenders in the region—New Braunfels has 106—but its ratio to normal residents is greater than many neighboring cities. According to KPD data, there is one registered sex offender for every 843 residents.“We’re really focused on creating what’s identified in the ordinance as child safety zone areas, where families can reside or families can enjoy the parks and other amenities in our community and feel safe,” Barnett said.

A KPD memo attached to the ordinance said offenders are extremely likely to use physical violence and to repeat offenses.

The same memo quotes a report published by the United States’ Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART), which states 44.3% of child molesters with more than one prior arrest reoffend.

However, the same SMART report also noted “the long-term recidivism rate for child molesters categorized as low risk was less than 20 percent.”

Mary Sue Molnar, chair of nonprofit advocacy group Texas Voices, said the registry is ineffective and hurts community safety. She said residency restrictions such as Kyle’s proposed ordinance are increasingly common, but create their own issues.“It’s displacing a lot of people—people that can really reintegrate and reenter society in a good way,” Molnar said. “We’re just shutting doors on them, just shutting every door we can, which seems like the opposite of what we should be doing.”

Among the key findings in the Department of Justice’s report, “Sex Offender Residency Restrictions: How Mapping Can Inform Policy,” residency restrictions were found to make it difficult or impossible for sex offenders to find housing.

Read the full article

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
    1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
    2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
    3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
    4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
    5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
    6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
    7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
    8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
    9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
    10. Please do not post in all Caps.
    11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
    12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
    13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
    14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
    15. Please do not solicit funds
    16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
    17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
    18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“but its ratio to normal residents”
Anyone have a definition of a “Normal Resident”? Websters does not seem to have it.

“A KPD memo attached to the ordinance said offenders are extremely likely to use physical violence and to repeat offenses.”
Fact OR Fiction?

There’s no such thing as a “child safety zone.” It’s a wish-fulfillment, nonsensical fantasy! Schools are often referred to as “child safety zones” yet that doesn’t seem to negate active shooters, bullying, drug use and teachers from accosting students for sex.

Another unsettling fact: There’s no such thing as a safe neighborhood, either.

@Facts…so true. Case in point is the Polly Klass abduction and murder. She wasn’t even safe in her own home.

Sounds about as effective as a Gun Free Zones. One thing is for sure, we’re all living in the upside down insanity of The Twilight Zone.

I like DOJ has a memo stating “How mapping can inform policy.”

When they ignore the 3-5% recidivism that has been observed in repeated studies.

Okay.

Notice that there is no remarks in the comment section supporting this new ordinance (as though residence restrictions are new). I find that a bit puzzling in that registrants are precluded from Facebook and the section requires it to leave a comment. If the people that live there think it’s so necessary to make them “feel safe” there, I would think someone would post in support.

It tells me that the ordinance is nothing more than grandstanding for whoever proposed it.

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.