ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule

National

Charles Rodrick Arraigned Today in Arizona Court

[ACSOL]

Charles Rodrick, who charged registrants up to $500 to have their personal information removed from websites he created, was arraigned today in Arizona.  During today’s arraignment, Rodrick entered a plea of not guilty to all charges for which he has been indicted.  Rodrick is scheduled to return to court on June 8 for a pretrial conference.  Because Rodrick posted bond, he is living in the community and wearing a GPS tracking device.

In addition to Rodrick, two of his colleagues — Brent Oesterblad and Sarah Shea — have also been indicted on similar criminal charges.  Oesterlad and Shea are scheduled for arraignment on April 27 in the same Arizona court.  A trial in this matter is scheduled for September 9, 2021.

Restitution may be available to those who paid for removal of their personal information from Rodrick’s websites as well as to others he harmed financially or otherwise.  Information regarding how to file for restitution can be found at www.courtkey.com.

Indictment – Rodrick – 2021  PDF  Download

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
    1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
    2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
    3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
    4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
    5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
    6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
    7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
    8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
    9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
    10. Please do not post in all Caps.
    11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
    12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
    13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
    14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
    15. Please do not solicit funds
    16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
    17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
    18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Thank you for this link. Consider its use in the context of an FTR defense.
Q: Agent what is the purpose of the information demanded by sex offender registration form?
A: We collect it for reasons as described in law.
Q: Is that all the people use the registry for lawful purposes?
A: Yes, that is why it is done.
Q In your experience as an agent have you encountered an instance of unlawful use of registry information.

@Tim in WI:
Q: Is that all the people use the registry for lawful purposes?”
That would get a quick “Obejction!” from the State’s attorney. Answering it requires speculation, as well as knowledge beyond that which is available to the official. There’s no way the official could know the purposed behind every use by every single person.

Well yes, except recently WI SOR forms come with an additional strip of paper about 2×9. The small piece is a warning about scammers. it even gives a number to call if attempts are made. Door OPEN!

I’m watching this case closely. Thanks for sharing this information.

If anything, this case should expose the controversial aspects of the registry and it’s sub-coded punitive nature. If it WERE a legitimate “public safety” law, all of these subsequent and opportunistic third-parties would have no need to exist if there were NO money to be made from the embarrassment and shame relief if it wasn’t PUNITIVE in the first place!

Make no mistake, Megan’s law IS punitive, vindictive and retaliatory in nature and scope.

Wow I googled my name and nothing pops up anymore i guess those website aren’t as cocky and bold as they used to be back in the early 2000s.

Thanks Janice and ACSOL i give you guys mad props for this one good job team 💪😊

Due to the severity of the stalking and online harassment, I believe the FBI ended up getting involved in having Google redact names from search results relating to a handful of websites. Because like magic, my information was removed virtually overnight everywhere it was posted. Also, many of the websites have been taken offline as well. In 2015, I know that Google began suppressing results from a handful of websites from their search results, including Mugshots (dot) com. This was around the same time Visa and Mastercard stopped payment processing companies from working with these kinds of companies.

Would OffenderWatch be one of those that seek money from the civil club members? Those that scam people out of money from their pasts, must have some of skeletons in their closet and be miserable people to be around.

Once upon a time, DMV records were publicly accessible by anyone in CA, until actress Rebecca Schaeffer was murdered in 1967. Perhaps, we need a celebrity “sacrificial lamb,” to shutdown free access to the registry???

Restitution MAY be available. After his lawyer gets his money and the courts get their money, if any left, everyone will have to file a civil suit and wait for 8 yrs while the system drags along at its usual snail with a broken leg pace. Write it off as lesson learned and move on.

Don’t write it off. Crush them. Hold every one of this scum and his associates accountable. Clog the system and drag it down with your demand for justice. Don’t do it for money, do it for spite.

11
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.