ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (04/16 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings




PA: Bill Cosby freed from prison, his sex conviction overturned

Source: 6/30/21

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Pennsylvania’s highest court threw out Bill Cosby’s sexual assault conviction and released him from prison Wednesday in a stunning reversal of fortune for the comedian once known as “America’s Dad,” ruling that the prosecutor who brought the case was bound by his predecessor’s agreement not to charge Cosby.

Cosby, 83, flashed the V-for-victory sign to a helicopter overhead as he trudged into his suburban Philadelphia home after serving nearly three years of a three- to 10-year sentence for drugging and violating Temple University sports administrator Andrea Constand in 2004.

The former “Cosby Show” star — the first celebrity tried and convicted in the #MeToo era — had no comment as he arrived, and just smiled and nodded later at a news conference outside, where his lawyer Jennifer Bonjean said: “We are thrilled to have Mr. Cosby home.”

“He served three years of an unjust sentence and he did it with dignity and principle,” she added.

In a statement, Constand and her lawyers called the ruling disappointing, and they, like many other advocates, expressed fear that it could discourage sexual assault victims from coming forward. “We urge all victims to have their voices heard,” they added.

Cosby was arrested in 2015, when a district attorney armed with newly unsealed evidence — the comic’s damaging deposition in a lawsuit brought by Constand — filed charges against him just days before the 12-year statute of limitations was about to run out.

But the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said Wednesday that District Attorney Kevin Steele, who made the decision to arrest Cosby, was obligated to stand by his predecessor’s promise not to charge Cosby, though there was no evidence that agreement was ever put in writing.

Justice David Wecht, writing for a split court, said Cosby had relied on the previous district attorney’s decision not to charge him when the comedian gave his potentially incriminating testimony in Constand’s civil case.

The court called Cosby’s subsequent arrest “an affront to fundamental fairness, particularly when it results in a criminal prosecution that was forgone for more than a decade.” It said justice and “fair play and decency” require that the district attorney’s office stand by the decision of the previous DA.

The justices said that overturning the conviction and barring any further prosecution “is the only remedy that comports with society’s reasonable expectations of its elected prosecutors and our criminal justice system.”

Cosby was promptly set free from the state prison in suburban Montgomery County and driven home.

“What we saw today was justice, justice for all Americans,” said a Cosby spokesperson, Andrew Wyatt. ”Mr. Cosby’s conviction being overturned is for the world and all Americans who are being treated unfairly by the judicial system and some bad officers.”

Bonjean said Cosby was “extremely happy to be home” and “looks forward to reuniting with his wife and children.” Several supporters outside yelled, “Hey, hey, hey!” — the catchphrase of Cosby’s animated Fat Albert character — which brought a smile from him.

He later tweeted an old photo of himself with his fist raised and eyes closed, with the caption: “I have never changed my stance nor my story. I have always maintained my innocence. Thank you to all my fans, supporters and friends who stood by me through this ordeal. Special thanks to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for upholding the rules of law.”

In a statement, Steele, the district attorney, said Cosby went free “on a procedural issue that is irrelevant to the facts of the crime.” He commended Constand for coming forward and added: “My hope is that this decision will not dampen the reporting of sexual assaults by victims.”

“I am furious to hear this news,” actor Amber Tamblyn, a founder of Time’s Up, an advocacy group for sex-crime victims, said on Twitter. “I personally know women who this man drugged and raped while unconscious. Shame on the court and this decision.”

But “Cosby Show” co-star Phylicia Rashad tweeted: “FINALLY!!!! A terrible wrong is being righted — a miscarriage of justice is corrected!”

Four Supreme Court justices formed the majority that ruled in Cosby’s favor, while three others dissented in whole or in part.

Peter Goldberger, a suburban Philadelphia lawyer with an expertise in criminal appeals, said prosecutors could ask the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for reargument or reconsideration, but it would be a very long shot.

“I can’t imagine that with such a lengthy opinion, with a thoughtful concurring opinion and a thoughtful dissenting opinion, that you could honestly say they made a simple mistake that would change their minds if they point it out to them,” Goldberger said.

Even though Cosby was charged only with the assault on Constand, the judge at his trial allowed five other accusers to testify that they, too, were similarly victimized by Cosby in the 1980s. Prosecutors called them as witnesses to establish what they said was a pattern of behavior on Cosby’s part.

Cosby’s lawyers had argued on appeal that the use of the five additional accusers was improper. But the Pennsylvania high court did not weigh in on the question, saying it was moot, given the finding that Cosby should not have been prosecuted in the first place.

In sentencing Cosby, the trial judge had declared him a sexually violent predator who could not be safely allowed out in public and needed to report to authorities for the rest of his life.

In May, Cosby was denied parole after refusing to participate in sex offender programs behind bars. He said he would resist the treatment programs and refuse to acknowledge wrongdoing even if it meant serving the full 10 years.

The groundbreaking Black actor grew up in public housing in Philadelphia and made a fortune estimated at $400 million during his 50 years in the entertainment industry that included the TV shows “I Spy,” “The Cosby Show” and “Fat Albert,” along with comedy albums and a multitude of television commercials.

The suburban Philadelphia prosecutor who originally looked into Constand’s allegations, Montgomery County District Attorney Bruce Castor, considered the case flawed because Constand waited a year to come forward and stayed in contact with Cosby afterward. Castor declined to prosecute and instead encouraged Constand to sue for damages.

Questioned under oath as part of that lawsuit, Cosby said he used to offer quaaludes to women he wanted to have sex with. He eventually settled with Constand for $3.4 million.

Portions of the deposition later became public at the request of The Associated Press and spelled Cosby’s downfall, opening the floodgates on accusations from other women and destroying the comic’s good-guy reputation and career. More than 60 women came forward to say Cosby violated them.

The AP does not typically identify sexual assault victims without their permission, which Constand has granted.

Cosby, in the deposition, acknowledged giving quaaludes to a 19-year-old woman before having sex with her at a Las Vegas hotel in 1976. Cosby called the encounter consensual.

On Wednesday, the woman, Therese Serignese, now 64, said the court ruling “takes my breath away.”

“I just think it’s a miscarriage of justice. This is about procedure. It’s not about the truth of the women,” she said. Serignese said she took solace in the fact Cosby served nearly three years behind bars: “That’s as good as it gets in America” for sex crime victims.


This story has been corrected to show that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did not express an opinion on the use of additional accusers


Follow Maryclaire Dale on Twitter at

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Good for him. Worked the system and won. At that age, who gives a F*** what the public thinks. Still gets his royalties, still lives the good life. Public opinion is for spineless twits that need affirmation. We should all know that by now.

In my opinion this is a huge victory regarding the 5th Amendment and when it comes to promises given to a defendant by the government. I don’t care if he actually did it because that isn’t the issue. He was lured into basically testifying against himself with the promise that he wouldn’t be charged. Then he was charged. They can’t do that, and the PA Supreme Court made a sound ruling in my opinion.

Now that you mention it…I relied on the government when the registration was like signing up for Price Club….once a year and it was difficult if you were not LEO to see the records.

Of course they, the government, have completely changed the conditions I MUST live under today…entirely ex post facto, and would I have accepted the deal offered since my victim (? haha) refused to testify against me.

The other issues is that so many cases, to include BC’s, mention Quaaludes…gads, in that day, we all took 714’s and were happy for a clean (sort of) high, (see Wolf of Wall Street)….I never saw Q’s a sex drug, (who could perform when so high?), but we were all huggy and party hard mode….I tend to think that all people took Q’s voluntarily…and were happy to have one.

This may not be popular to say…but I think women have agency also in what they and we do in life.

Best Wishes, James I

This is the legal opinion of one atty who opined last night on the case despite the fact they represented women in the case: The 5th Amendment must stand.

A better idea is to not talk at all. When the police question you, there should only be one of two answers. 1: “I don’t answer questions,” 2: “My attorney will be in contact with you.”
I only wish I knew my constitutional rights 30 years ago.

I watched a YouTube video on it’s a good idea not to the police. Way to many people think they have nothing to hide and are innocent, so they end up getting busted.

Personally I think DAs that break plea deals or other agreements should be charged with misconduct and disbarred. Lawmakers who pass laws based on no evidence should be thrown out of office regardless of party. If they violate the Constitution they belong in an institution.

Yup. Cosby got off on a technicality, not innocence. He shouldn’t have made that statement upon release. He certainly wasn’t vindicated of wrong doing.

Oy, veh, the right to remain silent is a constitutional right, not a technicality. They didn’t have enough evidence to charge him and he was told by the DA he would not be charged due to any admissions in his civil disposition. The new DA reneged on that deal and charged him anyway. It is a FUNDAMENTAL right. It’s no wonder so many don’t understand since crime dramas on TV kick this around like it’s only a technicality. Law and Order SUV is the worst. Read the opinion if you want to bypass the media headlines and understand.

This should be a warning shot for lying D.A.’s.

Well it’d be nice to see the prosecutor in this case find his or herself in front of the Pennsylvania state’s bar association for misconduct charges.

It won’t be. The injustice here is a guilty man was released on a technicality, while innocent men continue to rot in prison because bad DA’s suppress evidence, and bad judges go along on the technicality of the conviction being set in stone regardless of new evidence.

I’m guessing nondisclosure was one of the terms with the purported victim and the others who testified against him. If so, I think they should be obligated to pay back whatever he gave them.

Probably shouldn’t confuse the criminal process and the civil process.

I knew of the agreement Cosby attorney made with DA’s office as it was widely reported by our press weeks before Cosby’s deposition.
Obviously the DA understood that was always going to be, or likely to be the outcome via the signed agreement. Nevertheless, DA prosecuted anyway as a signal to the plaintiffs that he\she cared. It is like the public bloodletting of old, to lend credibility to sanctify the process. Essentially Cosbys lawyers successfully defended a man they thought was guilty by demanding said non prosecution agreement prior to his formal deposition. That is the kind of defense strategy not available to poor folks. On the other side of the coin this is precisely why all who ” plea out” are compelled by the process and the DA to sign the standard waiver of civil right upon their plea.

I understand this is the supreme court of another state and not the national supreme court, but I find myself wondering what if any precedent this might set for California, given that the state legislature erased thousands similar agreements retroactively with a vote and the stroke of a pen.

How many of those without relief via the tiered registry fall into this category?

I see many lamenting that Cosby’s “excellent representation” is only for the rich. Again, given the thousands that the retroactive decision represents, how is it that THIS path has not been pursued as a class action before now?

Agreements by district attorneys that are vacated unilaterally STILL represent both legislative and proprietorial clear and obvious misconduct… At least in the light of the Cosby decision and to my non-legal profession eye.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x