UK: Declan Lancaster started killer blaze after wrongly believing another man living there had a sex offense conviction

Source: 7/2/21

A killer who sparked a deadly fire at his hostel after he wrongly concluded a man who lived there had a sex offense conviction in his past, has been jailed for life.
By Karon Kelly
Friday, 2nd July 2021, 2:49 pm

Declan Lancaster, who had taken a cocktail of drink and drugs, started a blaze in a linen cupboard at Manor House in Sunderland on November 3, 2018, because he wanted to “scare and frighten” another tenant.

Newcastle Crown Court heard as the flames took hold, Patryk Mortimer, a resident who was not the 24-year-old’s intended target, tried to get out but died just before he reached the fire escape.

The 39-year-old victim, who was from Poland, was described by his grieving mum as a very intelligent man who could speak six or seven languages and had travelled the world until drink and drugs put him on a downward spiral.

Prosecutor David Brooke QC told the court: “A post mortem confirmed he had died as a result of the affects of the fire, most likely the affects of smoke inhalation and he also had a laceration to his forehead.

“In the opinion of the pathologist, this was consistent with striking his head against and object as he tried to crawl out of the building, which might have caused a concussion type head injury, preventing him from leaving.

“The nature of the burns suggest they occurred after the head injury and collapse.”
Related article: Body-cam footage shows Declan Lancaster shouting at police as he is arrested after fatal fire which killed Patryk Mortimer

Mr Brooke said Mr Mortimer had been “very unlucky to die as he did” and added; “If he chose to leave from the window, like everyone else, or stayed in his room, which suffered little damage, he would have survived.
“It is only because he left his room, understandably, he was overcome by flames in the corridor.

“He died, sadly, just a few feet from the fire exit.”

The court heard the owners of the building, which had caused controversy in the community because of some tenants who had caused trouble in the past, have been left with a £630,000 after the insurance company declined to pay out after the blaze.

Lancaster, of no fixed address, admitted manslaughter and arson being reckless as to the endangerment of life.
He repeatedly interrupted the sentence hearing, initially by whistling, complaining “I’ve already heard this” and later by telling the judge “you are ******* me off now”.

He was removed from the hearing before the judge imposed the life sentence or said he must serve at least five years before he is eligible to apply for parole.

Judge Paul Sloan QC said the arsonist, who has a “fascination with fire”, “poses a high level of danger to the public” and had been targeting another rival, not Mr Mortimer.

Judge Sloan told him: “Your motivation was to scare, to frighten him, possibly because you believed him to have [a sex offense conviction in his past].

“You also wanted to be re-housed and you wanted to burn the place down and render it unusable.”

The judge said he had “no doubt whatsoever” Lancaster is a significant risk to the public and warned: “In all likelihood he will remain incarcerated for a considerable time before the parole board conclude he is no longer a danger.”

Mr Brooke told the court how after the fire, when the identity of the arsonist remained a mystery, Lancaster confessed to his new girlfriend.

But the court heard he “didn’t appear upset and indeed appeared proud of what he had done“.

After he split from the woman he sent her a letter which confessed to the killing and warned he would “do the same thing” to her new man.

Police outside the former Manor House Care Home following the death of Patryk Mortimer in a fire in the early hours.

Lancaster had initially denied he started the blaze and told police: “Do you think I’m going to burn my house down” and “Do you think I’m going to murder my best friend, are you ****** daft?”

But he later told a prison officer he had been responsible and eventually confessed to detectives.

The court heard Lancaster has 36 convictions for offences which include arson, damaging property and violence.

He set fire to his home as a child and sparked more blazes while growing up.

The court heard Lancaster has personality disorders but the judge said that offered little mitigation for the fatal offence as he had voluntarily consumed drink and drugs.

Nicholas Lumley QC, defending, said this was a “senseless and truly tragic loss of a man’s life” and that Lancaster, who was 21 when he started the fire, was immature.

The court heard Lancaster and other residents had banged on Mr Mortimer’s window from the outside once they had got to safety and realised he was not there.


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Seems my mind is telling me that since this guy has a fascination with fire he had planned to burn this place anyway and then thinking if he used the excuse it was to kill/hurt a sex offender that it would justify his actions and people would feel for him and even stand by him.

Once again, a murderer claims he thought the victim was a “sex offender” as a defense in hopes for leniency. I didn’t see one word about the judge (or anyone else) telling him something to the effect that it doesn’t matter if he was a “sex offender” or not, he doesn’t have the right to kill.

Can’t help wondering how different the story would have been written had it been a registrant that dies in the fire set by this guy.

Could you imagine if the arsonist was on the hit list and the emotional bills that follow; yet all I hear are crickets on his excuse “I thought a person convicted of a sex offense lived here so I lit the place up.”

The problem with being the world’s top dog is that the rest of the world tend to follow even the worst of your ideas. Wasnt it Scalia? who spouted, I would think the people should be able to use a database any damn well they decide to. What an ignorant position. I guess if ya can drop an Abomb anything is possible. BUT TO WHAT DISTRUCTION?!

“The court heard Lancaster has 36 convictions for offences which include arson, damaging property and violence….He set fire to his home as a child and sparked more blazes while growing up

The headline should read: “Yet another failure by the criminal justice system”. (Makes no diff if it’s the UK, USA, or any other country). Prior to this nightmare, this young man needed to be off the streets until he no longer posed a danger to anyone else. With 36 prior convictions, it would be glaringly obvious to even Helen Keller that he was a ticking time bomb. Did the previous 35 judges, prosecutors, probation officers, c.o.’s, wardens (and probably the media as well) not notice?

Then this wise judge proclaims that these facts “offered little mitigation”. Shades of Pontius. ‘Washed his hands and sealed his fate.’

“And as a single leaf turns not yellow but with the silent knowledge of the whole tree so the wrong-doer cannot do wrong without the hidden will of you all.” K. Gibran

At least it’s keeping children safe, right?

In the UK, “life” generally means 2-3 years.