Singapore: No reason to raise age limit above 50 for caning sex offenders

Source: 9/14/21

Singapore — Member of Parliament Murali Pillai (PAP – Bukit Batok) said that serious sex offenders should still be caned regardless of their age because this would be a stronger deterrent against such offences.

Speaking in Parliament on Monday (Sept 13), Mr Murali suggested that the current cut-off age of 50 years for caning serious sex offenders was “not fit for purpose.”

He observed that middle-aged sex offenders tend to target younger victims; therefore, they should be strongly deterred from such actions.

Read the full article


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I love the foreign news on this blog. I can dig it. It is not lost on me that Singapore still utilizes corporal punishment. Its a basic societal choice. No doubt our bedwetters in mainstream media would feign contortions upon it’s use upon Americans. Cruel and unusual they’d call it, especially as promulgated to children. The sex offender, however, might not be such a reach given the current trend. Then again, caning is a cheap punishment compared to the cost of registration. Caning however only occurs one time so less labor costs is incurred by the people of Singapore. These facts mirror and evidences the American tendency to increase the reach of punishment for crime.

They could have caned the crap out of me if it spared me 8 years in the joint and a lifetime on the public registry. In fact, I’d take a caning and 8 years locked up over being a registrant which ranks among the most cruel and unusual punishment ever concocted.
I bet we’d see a huge reduction in recidivism across the board with a reinstatement of corporal punishment.

I’d rather be canined annually 5 working days before or after my birthday for the rest of my life then be on the registry

Good luck

I don’t see anywhere in the article where it mentions what is meant by caning. 1 blow? 5 blows? 10 blows? 100 blows? 1000 blows? Seems like that would make quite a difference before we all volunteer for that in lieu of registering.

Also, does the caning represent the entire sentence, or is it in addition to some years in prison?

Also, the article didn’t mention whether or not Singapore has its own registry, and offenders would also be on that, in addition to the caning.

Lest anyone think this is like getting spanked by ones mother or teacher back in the day Google “judicial caning”. As oracticed in Singapore and I believe Malaysia, it is a rather harsh punishment.