IL: Changes will deny probation for some child pornographers

Source: wgem.com 12/29/21

QUINCY (WGEM) – There’s a change to a law that has to do with possession of child pornography.

Legislators closed a loophole that allowed family members found to be in possession of child pornography to escape jail time.

Starting on Jan. 1, possession of child pornography when the child is a household or family member is a non-probational offense. This means the offender will serve jail time if convicted.

Previously, this category of offenders could receive a sentence of probation for their pornography conviction.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Closing a loophole, my ass. This sounds like it just makes it easier for the Stasi to lock people up for innocent pictures of their own bubble-bearded kids in the bathtub.

Well
i guess everyone in Illinois better watch out especially if your tot, grandchildren, and great grandchildren are pictured in the tub, on the toilet, running outside naked, and anything else kids do. What rube comes up with these bills? What are they doing behind closed doors?

Just means Grandma taking photos of her naked bathing grandchildren will now be sentenced to prison.

So… Due to police “advancement in technology”, they were able to detect CP better; according to the argument.

I’m not entirely sure how this alone shows that children, consignees and dependent minors are any less safer with father/uncle/brother/cousin serving probation at home outside of jail. Apparently, they didn’t cover that in the article.

We know what this means. In situations of genuine abuse, Families will be more afraid of law enforcement, therapists, and other authorities and are more likely to cover it up. More children get abused. But that’s okay I guess, because these politicians and prosecutors don’t actually care about children’s welfare. More important to appear “tough on crime”. Just the law enforcement and political lobby being snivelling, hypocritical scum, utterly unworthy of the slightest bit of respect the herd public mindlessly give them.