WA: Livid parent accuses police of using kids as ‘bait’ to catch sex offender near school

Source: aol.com 3/4/24

A convicted sex offender is accused of driving by a Tri-Cities middle school more than two dozen times over the course of a week and allegedly exposing himself to at least two children.

And parents are furious that they weren’t notified until after he was arrested.

Javier _____, 29, of Benton City, was arrested by the Benton County Sheriff’s Office last week and charged with indecent exposure and failure to register as a sex offender.

On Feb. 22, a detective with a unit that specializes in violent crime prevention was called to Enterprise Middle School regarding an open West Richland police investigation.

The incident involved a student who reported a naked man in a black Subaru Impreza tried to lure her close to his car by asking for directions.

West Richland police were notified by the school and increased patrols in the area after the first report was made to them on Feb. 20. At one point they found the car and attempted to pull Ayala-Colin over, but he fled and they were unable to chase him because of state law restrictions on pursuits, according to a news release from the West Richland Police Department.

A student first reported the man asking for directions more than a week before, but it appears the school did not make a report about the initial encounter to WRPD, according to information released by the department.

After the sheriff’s detective got involved, the man was quickly arrested and only then did the school notify other parents of what had happened.

When detectives searched his car they reported finding a plastic grocery bag with stuffed animals, a plastic dinosaur, cameras and rope.

Now parents are demanding answers from the school district on why officials remained silent for a week before West Richland police were asked to investigated.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Before everyone gets in a twist about how this one registrant makes life harder on everyone else, I think we should look at it as a demonstration of the registry’s uselessness as a public safety tool.

Assuming the allegations in the article are true for the sake of argument, I don’t see what difference the registry made in this case, despite the reporter’s stressing that the accused is a registrant and that FTR was added to his charges. Are we to believe that had he registered as required he wouldn’t have been in front of that school?

Did the registry have anything to do with identification when the first incident was reported? Not that I could see. They traced his car first and his record followed. Despite not staying at the registered address, they found him anyway. I can’t believe anything in this story from identification to arrest would have been different if there were no registry. Adding that his bail was set at a mere $10k suggests that his offenses, while concerning, were not as serious as the article suggests. I’ve seen higher bail for FTR alone.

I really think we need to start confronting these reporters and their sensationalism. Perhaps flooding their inboxes would suggest that they start looking at and reporting the registry’s futility rather than just mentioning and leaving it to the reader to assume it works as intended, especially in cases like this (few and far between they are).

Separately, the lady complaining that it is the school board’s responsibility to protect their kids is grossly misguided, in my view. The safety of children is a parental responsibility. It takes a special kind of idiocy to entrust that to the government at any level, considering how they routinely screw up anything else they ever address.

Last edited 1 month ago by Dustin

These are exactly the kind of things that are going to “justify” universal GPS. It “solves everything”!!!

FTR? GPS.
School Drive-by? GPS.
Need to terrorize people into voting for you? GPS!
Need more Cops? GPS!
Need a way to make your fabricated Boogeymen seem scarier? GPS!

Yes, through the magic of GPS now the Boogeyman is everywhere… Everywhere…EVERYWHERE! There’s one behind you right now!!!

Just one of the many, many, many ways the “Justice system” finds ways to be rewarded for failure. Never forget, crime is out of control… so we need more cops! Funny how that always seems to be true…always…everywhere…forever!