OH: Final conspirator in scheme to exploit Ohio sex offenders get four-year sentence

Source: zanesvilletimesrecorder.com 8/21/25

ZANESVILLE – Inmates within the Georgia prison system organized a defrauding scheme in 2024 to defraud sex offenders and across the country, including two male victims in Ohio.

Marquis Lamar Conner Sr., 43, of Decatur, Georgia, was the last of four defendants to go before the Muskingum County Court of Common Pleas for sentencing Aug. 18.

Per request, Conner argued for his own sentencing before Judge Kelly Cottrill. After a lengthy statement where he blamed the victims for being defrauded, Conner received four years in an Ohio prison to follow his release in Georgia, according to a community announcement from the Muskingum County Prosecutor’s Office

Assistant Prosecuting Attorney John Litle recommended the four-year sentence after Conner pleaded guilty to engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, a second-degree felony, in June.

Conner was also ordered to pay $9,400 in restitution to the victims, one of which lived in Muskingum County.

Two others, …

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Over the years, I’ve received multiple phone calls from individuals impersonating law enforcement-each one crafted to provoke fear, extract information, or coerce compliance. I never disclosed my identity. I asked for their name, then hung up. When I reported the first incident to the local police station, the desk sergeant dismissed it as a prank, saying it was “probably someone in their mother’s basement” and not worth pursuing. He added, “If we’re after you, we won’t call-we just come.” That response revealed more than apathy; it exposed a systemic refusal to investigate impersonation when the target is already stigmatized. Still, it taught me a valuable lesson: never trust a phone caller. I have since deleted the calls. I archive only what protects. The rest, I release. Truth.

The registry is a government invitation to injury/harm/kill, harass, and commit fraud all because of a false label of we were, we are and will always be dangerous.

Blame the victims for being exploited is rich, how about not doing whatever you want just because you believe in street justice. 4 years is too short of a sentence in my opinion.

I hope ACSOL is adding this piece of evidence to the long list that the registry is purposely putting PFR and their loved one in danger. We have had murders b/c the registry was used. We have had extortion because the registry was used. With this case, we have people in prison use the registry to extort monies. People in prison are doing this scheme!

Eventually, history will reflect how evil a punishment the registry was and how passing such a judgement was “manifestly arbitrary and unreasonable” (reference from the Douglas County judge wrongly blocked man from de-registering.” The government is exposing all these defendants who have already paid their dues to society, but the gov’t is absolved from all the wrongdoings that occur from exposing all the defendants who have already paid their dues to society.

Where is the constitutional review or oversight? PFR are not protected equally like free citizens or freed citizens (other convict groups who finished their duties to society). Oh… that’s right, because the gov’t wrongly cited that the registry was just a regulatory scheme b/c these people convicted of sex crimes have a “frightening and high” recidivism rate of 80%. We have an academic paper that shows SCOTUS used wrong, false data via Dr. Ira Ellman and Tara Ellman. We also have several decade studies from different states that show low recidivism rates of around 3-3.5%. CA showed under 1% when focused only on recidivism. DoJ cited 5% in the article “Denied for old crimes: The complex challenge of long-term care for America’s aging PFR.”

Even when one is off the registry, that is only recognized in a few states. You can still be put back onto the registry. How is that even constitutionally possible if you haven’t committed any new sex crime?

PFR do not have equal rights as other citizens. More like “3/5th rights as citizens”.