General Comments Aug 2025

Comments that are not specific to a certain post should go here, for the month of Aug 2025.  Contributions should relate to the cause and goals of this organization and please, keep it courteous and civil. This section is not intended for posting links to news articles without additional relevant comment.

 

Other months General Comments

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

133 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Registry-Based Exclusion and Compelled Speech: A Constitutional Warning
Churches, schools, parks, and civilian institutions that require PFR to disclose status, sign disclaimers, or submit to surveillance may be violating the First Amendment’s protection against compelled speech. The right to remain silent is foundational—affirmed in Barnette, Wooley, and Becerra. When exclusion is codified and speech is coerced, these entities risk unconstitutional conduct.
Under Bob Jones University v. United States, tax-exempt status can be revoked when discrimination violates public policy. Denying PFR access to publicly funded spaces—while compelling speech—may trigger similar scrutiny under §501(c)(3). Equal access is not optional when others are taxed to enter freely.
Disclaimer: This is a constitutional critique, not legal advice. Affected individuals should consult qualified counsel

Has anyone considered “Slab City” as a destination to live.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slab_City,_California

It’s located in the Sonoran Desert and is a honest to god rent free community that leaves people alone. It’s on public land (an old military base) so zero state/fed government oversight, no police, no state or fed taxes. Residents are mostly alternative lifestyle types, such as artists, homeless, seasonal travelers, etc. Not sure, might need to be off the registry, but if you like RV style living, this could be an opportunity. There are no public utilities, so most have power generators, solar panels and go to town for water and supplies. water is sold there for $15/gal. I saw an article where a couple had lived there for the past 7 yrs and it was costing them approx. $5000 a yr in expenditures. The man had an online job and the woman did errands and chores for others. They had a 50 gal water barrel and said if they needed something that residents there used a barter system. Talk about being left alone! only about 150 permanent residents with an annual pilgrimage of about 2000 people throughout the yr. You simply inquire about a “slab” ( where a bldg was removed) or an open area and walla! there is a a kind of council that meets informally to discuss disputes, community events etc. Sounds interesting.

Just a heads up for those that visit HomeDepot, Targets and Wal-Mart.

They all use an API software that law enforcement has access to via: https://www.auror.co/

Bascially, loss prevention and LEOs have access to “Auror” software that can tell all the stores you’ve entered with all the microdata including – day, time and locations of all stores. Once you walk in, they basically have your tag number, name and address. If that weren’t creepy enough, they catalog your height, weight and gate using that as a “fingerprint” to identify you. It goes far beyond facial rec because law enforcement can spy on and track OUR movements without a warrant all from the comfort of their local sherrifs’ office using a desktop. They can monitor our buying habits clandestinely and can validate their reasonable suspcion claims when case building.

Store managers can clandestinely snap your photo with their cell phones then upload it to Auror database and cross reference your analytics, purchase history and if you’re a registrant.

Just something to be aware of is you frequent a Wal-mart or Sam’s Club.

Last edited 12 hours ago by FactsShouldMatter

Does the sherrif’s department still conduct compliance checks even after probation? Been off for a while now. I wasn’t home but they came looking for me today stating they were doing a compliance check. They asked my roommates if I lived there and if I would be there later tonight. Worried that something may be up. If I’m not at work, I’m with my girlfriend. Because I’m not home very much, it doesn’t look like I live there even though I sleep there. All of my stuff is in storage while my girlfriend and I find a place that will accept me. I ended up giving up my room to my roommates daughter and her son so I’ve just been crashing on the couch. Plus I find it odd that they stopped by on a Sunday. I’m going to be there tonight but I’m getting worried. Any help or advice would be really appreciated. Residing in CA.