SD: Sex offender restriction bill dies in a House panel

Source: keloland.com 2/11/26

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (KELO) — A bill Republican Rep. Aaron Aylward said was designed to protect children from sex offenders in South Dakota was too broad, several members of the House Judiciary Committee said Wednesday.

Aylward’s bill House Bill 1167A was sent to its death on a 41st Day motion. His original bill was amended by removing the word “loitering,” which meant that any sex offender who entered a safety zone would be in violation.

Those who voted against the bill said it went too far.

“I can’t support this today,” committee member Republican Rebecca Reimer said.

“I want to protect children,” Reimer said. But, “when I asked if a (sex offender) would get in trouble conducting everyday business (the response from Aylward was yes).”

But committee member Republican Rep. David Kull, a retired police chief, said law enforcement can investigate reported incidents that involved a sex offender. The key is loitering and the intent, Kull said.

“Changing this from loitering to entering, from a law enforcement standpoint is very problematic,” Kull said.

In Sioux Falls, for example, a person can’t avoid a safety zone if they drive across town, because they have to cross the city’s bicycle trail system, which is a safety zone.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

If you are feeling extremely depressed and possibly even suicidal, please call or text 988 (suicide hotline) or any loved one who you believe is immediately available. If you feel depressed and in need of a friendly community and unbiased emotional support, you can email Alex and Marty at emotionalsupportgroup@all4consolaws.org

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“I do believe it would prevent them from doing that,” Aylward said. Yet, he said, that isn’t the intent of the law”. There it is again “That’s not the intent of the law”. Sure, a PFR can be arrested and thrown back into prison for for simply driving across a bike trail on their way to Price Club on the other side of town…but that’s not the intent. These people are f@#king insane. And they think we’re a danger?

A parent brought up seeing a registrant at an elementary school, where the registrant wasn’t committing a sex crime otherwise it would of been mentioned. Does the parent know that classmates, teachers, family members, coaches, clergy, and others known to their offspring are a larger risk to their children? The safety zone should be around this parent’s logic because once a dummy, always a dummy.