Websites will no longer bill to remove mug shots

TOLEDO, Ohio – Two Internet sites that make money by posting millions of mug shots of people who’ve been arrested have agreed to stop charging them to take down their photos as part of a settlement in a federal lawsuit.

The lawsuit came about after a number of complaints from people who said the websites were charging hundreds of dollars to remove the mug shots even if the cases against those arrested had been dropped.

The settlement in U.S. District Court in Toledo doesn’t apply to all of the mug shot sites that can be found online, just two – BustedMugshots.com and MugshotsOnline.com. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This is a positive step forward in stopping those who extort money from registered citizens and others not convicted of a sex offense. Unfortunately, there are several more sites that need to be stopped. We are working diligently toward that goal.

Could someone please list the 2 sites so I can check to see if I am being listed. I will contact them and tell them to remove the listing. I would not find that information listed in the article.

It would seem to me that it would be easy to get those other sites to comply as well since this precedent has been set…if only someone or some powerful organization like…oh I don’t know…like the ACLU who has the funds would bother to do something.

I stopped supporting the ACLU a long time ago for inactivity with sex offender issues. Seems like defending the Constitution of the United States of America is not that important to them (at least as far as us lowly unpopular SEX OFFENDERS go)!

Does anyone (Janice?) know what the status of the sor archives case is? It’s the one that was moved to Arizona last year. I hope these creeps have to shut down because they will no longer be able to extort money from people with way to many challenges in their lives because of people like the ones that run these kind of sites.

For profit business using a person without consent has to be waaaaaay wrong and against the law….everyone should be getting alotta money for the wrongful business practice…yes..???…..who’s putting in a lawsuit for that..?..I’m in for BIG financial lawsuit.

In checking, I have noted that Google has in fact made an effort to push the photos from these sites many pages back in their listing so they are virtually nonexistent for the most part.One site, http://www.homefacts.com appears to have escaped their efforts and they still have some small photos on the first Google page. Need to work on them. Also Bing and Yahoo have made no similar effort to push photos from these mugshot sites toward the rear. Hopefully they can be persuaded to do the same in the near future.

Well I had a scheme to push my mugshot.com pic down to the bottom of Google, by flooding google image results with pics that came up with my last name. It worked great, until google automatically pushed it down to the bottom. Now anyone knowing about google’s policy and actively looking for a mugshot, will just go to the last result.

Thankfully, mugshotplanet.com removed my profile for free, after I sent proof of exoneration (Dismissal in California, AKA 1203.4). Mugshots.com did it for $199 (instead of $399) with the same proof, after I found this little “courtesy removal” link in their terms & conditions: http://unpublisharrest.com/terms-of-service/ under “Document Verification.”

So if you have an exoneration or dismissal (yes you’d still be on Megan’s Law, but want to get off the mugshots searches) you can try these methods.