ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Jan 16 Recording Uplaoded Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings


Orange County Pervs-in-Parks Ban Violates State Constitution: Judicial Panel

[UPDATED with OCDA Reaction:] See the update at the end of this post with the district attorney’s reaction to the judicial panel’s decision and vow to continue fighting for the ordinance.

The County of Orange ordinance that bars registered sex offenders from entering county parks and recreational areas has been ruled unlawful, according to a decision issued Nov. 15 by a panel of three Superior Court judges. The unanimous ruling does not apply to the ordinances several Orange County cities adopted at the urging of county Supervisor Shawn Nelson and District Attorney Tony Rackauckas, who authored the original county version the Board of Supervisors approved in April 2011. Full Article

Join the discussion

  1. mr b

    It may very well be that the supervisor and others who proposed this and other laws have a genuine interest in protecting the public. I don’t know their intent. What I do know is that there are a lot of experts in Orange County and the rest of the country who work with this offender population, who are familiar with the research, with the population, and have great ideas, well thought out and research-supported that would reduce the risk to the public. Many have offered to give input, consult with officials, and provide learned guidance about these issues. Many of these professionals have spent 10, 20 or more years studying this population alone. It is immoral, unethical, wrong, terrible, horrible governing on the part of elected officials to ignore these professionals, and to propose and pass laws about a population of citizens, apparently because it makes the official look good. I believe that this constitutes abuse of power, and should result in a recall of the elected officials.

    • toldyaso

      mr. b – appreciate your thoughtful comment and you clearly seem to know what you speak of… but I do, with all due respect, object to the term “this offender population”.

      As you most likely are aware, persons covered by this ordinance are all persons required to register under PC 290. This includes everyone from the person with one objectionable photo on his computer, the guy speaking rudely to a kid who is riding alone on a public bus, the guy slapping a teenager on the rear, kissing a 15-year old, down to the offender who abducts and rapes multiple toddlers.

      How does it make sense to lump all these people into one ‘population’?

      But WORD on the abuse of power and recall!

  2. toldyaso

    Is the timing of this unfortunate or ironic?

    Also see some of the other links in this article, pertaining to the Irvine election. Most interesting…

  3. USA

    Very good news. The thought of banning someone from living in a certain area within a city, banning them from parks, libraries and what not is surreal. Can you imagine being convicted of a Sex Offense and being banned from going to the Ocean? Thats surreal and unheard of. I commend the Judges.

  4. Mrs. H.

    The Judges should be commended. Very good news. Banning someone from living in a certain area within a city is wrong. Many families would like their family member to live with them, to watch out for them, but because of registration they cannot do this. I believe a community is safer when someone has the support of family. Again, the three judges are intelligent, understanding, and deserve to be commended.

  5. USA

    In essence, the ruling is certainly going to set California Up for something more. The bottom line is that you can’t put every Sex Offender in the same classification. THere are literally hundreds if not thousands of people convicted of Sex Crimes who do their time and go on to be model citizens without every having another legal issue in their lives. Yet, with have the DA in Orange County who in essence is passing hateful laws that are both unconstitutional and far fetched. Its truly surreal. This ruling along with others substantiates the need to develop and pass a Tier System here in California that would allow those individuals who have paid their debt to society to eventually get off the registry. ITS TIME. Wake up Tony!

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *