MI: Sex offender fee change is an idea whose time has come (Op-Ed)

Beginning April 1, registered sex offenders in Michigan will be required to pay an annual fee. Last year, Gov. Rick Snyder signed legislation requiring the state’s more than 40,000 registered sex offenders to come with a $50 per year registration fee.

The fee, which is applicable to registered sex offenders who are out of prison is not meant as an additional punishment to those who’ve already paid their societal debt, as much as it is intended to help defray the $600,000 a year cost to the Michigan State Police who run the sex offender database and website.

The new law, sponsored by Sen. Rick Jones, replaces the current system which provided a one-time $50 fee, in favor of the annual assessment. As in the past provisions will be made for those who cannot pay the annual fee.

This certainly makes sense to us. If, in the name of safety and security it is necessary to keep offenders on the database indefinitely, then it surely seems fair they should shoulder that financial burden than taxpayers.

It is an equalizer whose time has come. Opinion

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Please remember This is not meant as an additional punishment to those who’ve already PAID THEIR SOCIETAL DEBT………. Are you kidding me?

Reality check please!

Ok, so lets see…the government is are trying to force people illegally forced out of society by laws that the government has put into place to pay for their own listing on a list that they don’t want to be on and that just might result in them being killed.

Furthermore, being on that list prevents them from getting a job which would give them the funds to pay the fee in the first place…rather a catch 22 situation.

Clearly this is cruel and very unusual punishment…oh and it’s for life!

“These clauses of the Constitution are not of the broad, general nature of the Due Process Clause, but refer to rather precise legal terms which had a meaning under English law at the time the Constitution was adopted.  A bill of attainder was a legislative act that singled out one or more persons and imposed punishment on them, without benefit of trial.  Such actions were regarded as odious by the framers of the Constitution because it was the traditional role of a court, judging an individual case, to impose punishment.”  William H. Rehnquist, The Supreme Court, page 166.
…how far this country has strayed.

It’s bad enough most on the registry will never be able to retire; like me. And now they want them to pay!!!

I was out with some friends tonight and they were talking about retirement. I cant tell you how FU_KED UP I FELT! If that ever happens here I won’t pay.

It costs money to run a police state. It sounds like in Michigan, they are starting to run out.

If they tried this in California, I would assume that Janice or Frank would be camped outside on the steps leading to the Federal courtroom the first day after the law takes effect.

There is a cost to feel *safe* people. If you want to force people to be on a public register and to update it each time they move, or once a yr YOU get to absorb that cost.
Suck it up Buttercup.
Doncha feel ever so much safer now?????
Not a chance in hell I’d pay it.