LA Deputies Demanded Sex From Female Trainees: Lawsuit

A group of tattooed male deputies with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department who called themselves the “Banditos” allegedly sexually harassed female trainees and demanded sexual favors as part of initiation, according to a report by NBC News.

Guadalupe Lopez, who was assigned to the East Los Angeles Sheriff’s station in Boyle Heights beginning in 2011, is seeking unspecified damages. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Probably this is the last we’ll hear about this, a little cover-up here, a little coersion there, maybe some threats, payoffs and “on-going” investigations until the heat dies out.
I would, however, dance a jig and shout with joy if these (and all) bad cops lost their jobs and benefits and were put on a lifetime registry like all the little people. Seems like LE is getting much, much worse these days.

What? A sex offender in law enforcement? No…but they exist to enforce the laws not break them. I don’t believe it for a second…PLEASE just like the military, law enforcement is full of stupid people with issues and mental problems.

Here is a clear example. Of course, most likely nothing will come of it.

Remember the article over in SOSEN “Who really commits new sex crimes”? That article clearly pointed out with data from empirical sources that cops are the most likely to commit new sex crimes. Just do a Google search and you’ll see. Of course the lame stream media rarely reports on these crimes, and when they do they are usually buried deep within the paper.

It would be interesting to know how they got away with “gang” accouterments before this happened. The clothing, tats, and name clearly indicate a gang mentality.

This I learned from my offence: those with power over others are more likely to abuse, than those who share equal control. It is not surprising to me that those in authority, older relatives, church authorities, politicians and law enforcement are the main offenders, and strangers pose the least danger. All people in authority need a crash course in empathy and to make it part of their modus operandi and not just because of the possibility of sexual abuse. I’m thinking now of the homeless man in New Mexico who was killed by law enforcement for simply turning his back. When you are in power you have a responsibility to those in positions of weakness. That’s were the danger lies.