SB 1027 (Hill) – Criminal record information: commercial use

Existing law requires a business to take reasonable steps to protect unintended disclosure of customer information and limits the
way personal information on customers can be used and disseminated. 

This bill would prohibit a person who publishes criminal record information, as defined, via print or electronic means from soliciting or accepting a fee or other consideration to remove, correct, or modify that information, as specified. The bill would establish civil penalties for violations of these provisions. Bill Information

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  18. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  19. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  20. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It would be my guess that this lackluster bill will pass.

I agree that it is lackluster. While the extortion is a serious issue, it is no more serious than this information being readily available to ANYONE online. The state itself is not allowed to distribute this information generally, yet we allow private individuals to post it online in order to make money. How is there any logic to this? Why is this bill not addressing that — that is the real issue. That is the issue that creates the situation for the extortion.

Obviously, our government hasn’t shown any interest in protecting it’s content from these unscrupulous scoundrels.
I’m inclined to think there’s a possibility to prevent all of these shame based sites from using government copyrighted material they’re gleaming from citizen supported web pages so free and easy.


Any owner of copyrighted material can demand removal of their content with a:
Official Digital Millennium Copyright Act Infringement Demand

Perhaps I’m thinking wrong but are we not owners of this content we are paying tremendous amounts of money to collect, update, post and etc. through our tax dollars?

Sample DMCA:

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby swear under penalty of perjury that the information provided herein is accurate to the best of my knowledge. This letter is an official notification under provisions of section 512(c) of the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act to effect removal of the detected infringement listed in this location which infringes on copyrighted content from http://www.legit_copyright_web_page.html, wholly copyrighted by the citizens of California, of which we are a part, without knowledge or consent.

We hereby request that you immediately remove or block access to the infringing material, as specified in the DMCA, and insure the user refrains from using or sharing with others my_company materials in the future.