ACTION ALERT: What has the U.S. House done with the International Megan’s Law bill?

In my post of the 21st I basically explained how the U.S. House VIOLATED its own rules of procedure when passing International Megan’s Law act (HR-4573). I find it very disturbing that lawmakers expect the nation to follow rules while they violate them with impunity, but I guess that is some kind of a lawmaker’s code. Commentary

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I would like to write my senator regarding this bill. What is the senate bill number and title?

I for one since I’ve learned of the web site am beginning to see just how big of a circus ths all is and that the center ring (law makers) are nothing but a bunch of clowns.

Has any of these individuals checked to find the age of consent in Europe ranges in age from 13-18 with for example Sweden 13 France, Sweden 15, Russia, UK Switzerland 15. Canada is 16. Even in the United States 31 of our states considers and this includes Washington DC 16 as the age of consent. California is one of the few states with 18 as the age of consent. The number of registrants in California, I will add would be considerably lower if the age of consent was 16 like the majority of states in the US. So my point being what is the point of passing legislation when their is such a variance in the age of consent.

Thanks, Q, for posting those links. I know how to contact my senator.

In our local state legislature (not California), the bills, even if they are the same for both house and senate, often have different numbers. I don’t know if it is the same for the US congress.

This article/post, asking us to take action and contact our senator, tells us that International Megan’s Law act (HR-4573) has passed the US House of Representatives and is now headed to the senate.

Before I can write my senator about my concerns, I need to know the specific bill number and title that will be presented to the senate. Is it exactly the same title and number as the one that passed the house? If not, does anyone know the bill number and title being presented to the senate?

Once I have accurate information I can also write to everyone I know and ask them to contact their senator, too… but I need to make sure what I am telling them to do is accurate or else the effort will be wasted. I only get one chance at this.

Thank you in advance.

Voice your opposition here:
https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/113/hr4573