PA: Change in sex offender law leads to appeals

In September 2011, ____ ____, then 26, was arrested for having a relationship with a 15-year-old girl. … Six months later, he agreed to plead no contest to misdemeanor counts of indecent assault and corruption of minors, while the prosecution dropped felony statutory sexual assault. … Nowhere in the agreement or at his March 5, 2012, plea hearing was there ever any mention of having to register as a sex offender under Megan’s Law. …

So months later, when Mr. ____ was notified by the Pennsylvania State Police to comply with the new Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, which took effect in December 2012, Mr. Jones was mad. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This is pretty much identical to the Doe v. Harris case our California Supreme Court decided last year — to the detriment of registrants. Our high court disagrees with the Pennsylvania Superior Court, ruling that the state of the law at the time of a plea bargain is not binding, the law can be changed and applied to the defendant later. Our court’s ruling pretty much makes a plea bargain nearly useless. Under our high court’s decision, even if you work toward and meet the standard for relief from registration, and are granted relief, a change in the law later can be used to force you to start registering again — as many are now after previously having been granted relief under the old standard which now has been increased to having to apply for a pardon.

“Mr. Yung (law professor at the University of Kansas) countered by saying that sex offenders have the ability to avoid the punishment associated with registering by simply complying with the law.” – Really????

OMG. That is like saying prison or jail is not punishment as long as you adhere to all its rules and regulations (like staying in your little cell).

Bottom line…. Doe v. Smith. MUST. be. overturned. If it walks like a duck, if it talks like a duck….

That is the root of all evil. What to do? Who to do it? Is it Janice Bellucci who will end up doing it? If so, how?

THAT is the white whale that must be slain. Nothing else matters. This site should start collecting funds for this endeavor, specifically. I’m in.