ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule

National

MA: SJC upholds GPS monitoring of sex offenders

The state’s highest court has rejected a challenge to the state law that requires GPS monitoring during probation for people convicted of certain sex offenses involving a child.

The court said the law gave judges no discretion on whether to impose the GPS monitoring during probation, and the Legislature had good reasons for enacting the law. Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
    1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
    2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
    3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
    4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
    5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
    6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
    7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
    8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
    9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
    10. Please do not post in all Caps.
    11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
    12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
    13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
    14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
    15. Please do not solicit funds
    16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
    17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
    18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“Permissible legislative objectives concerning criminal sentencing include deterrence, isolation and incapacitation, retribution and moral reinforcement, as well as reformation and rehabilitation. … The provisions of [the law] reasonably can be viewed as serving many, if not all, of these goals,” – Justice Barbara Lenk

Does anyone fin this quote as scary as I do when she includes words like incapacitation and retribution? And why do reformation and rehabilitation seem to only be mentioned as an afterthought?

At least the article did say “The court noted that it did have concerns about GPS monitoring during probation when it is required ‘regardless of any individualized determination’ of a person’s dangerousness or risk of reoffending.”

This judge has been drinking way too much Kool-aid. I had a hard time getting past the fourth paragraph which states “GPS monitoring ‘MIGHT’ deter future or repeat offenders” and then says ” ‘WOULD’ promote the security and well-being of the general public.”
So… Which is it? “Might” or “would”? Probably neither considering the two guys who are up for murder while wearing GPS bracelets. And honestly, consider that this case is against a guy who was busted for CP dissemination. Likely ‘Limewire’ or something over the internet. How does monitoring his whereabouts protect the innocent citizens or children of our great nation in his case? It’s ludicrous.

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.