Wasco sex offender ordinance adopted in 2007 thrown out

WASCO, Calif. – A sex offender ordinance in Wasco challenged by a law firm has been thrown out.

The ordinance adopted by the city in 2007 restricted offenders from getting 300 feet near of public or private places. This involved public libraries, schools, parks, bus stops and child care centers.

A Central Coast law office challenged that ordinance on grounds that it was too broad and violated offenders’ constitutional rights. As part of the settlement, the city of Wasco must now pay legal fees. Article


Related posts

Notify of
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

As part of the settlement, the city of Wasco must now pay legal fees.

If the only thing they understand is pain – then lesson learned.

Anyone ever notice that whenever some city is forced to eat crow the news report, if there even is a news report, is usually really short? The opposite happens when these cities first get their letter informing them that their ordinances are illegal and they could be sued; the news reports are long; windy, and the media gives the offended counsel members a high stack of soap boxes to rant and rave against the laws of the land from. Personally; I think they should have to explain why they threw their oath of office out the window and went against law and order and have to pay court costs and attorney fees out of their own pocket. But then most citizens are void of any knowledge about the entire issue aside from what they have been told to believe would assume see all of us dead. So I guess I’m glad it’s they who are paying.

Excellent ..! ..excellent ..!.. thank you for challenging injustice and supporting and defending the Constitution …HomeRun works.

I wonder when other lawyers are going to join in so they can get some of this cash?

This is another example of why these laws are unconstitutional. How could I even take a vacation within Ca and know if I was breaking the law as I travelled throughout the state? In addition, it’s becoming increasingly confusing if I travel throughout the country? I’m presently 19 years registering for a battery that was expunged. /summary probation? What if I go to Texas? Idaho? This case would have only required me to register for 10 years in most states? It’s highly confusing (sexual battery means one thing in Ca and another in states like Texas)? It’s time for California to institute a tiered system and allow people to get on with their lives. First time offenders can be rehabilitated!

If other lawyers would join in most of these unjust and unconstitutional laws would drop off the books all across the country, this has to be done!

Good job CARSOL.