ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Nov 21, Dec 19 – Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings 2020 (Phone only)

International

Canada: B.C. rights group says mandatory minimums cost billions but don’t reduce crime

VANCOUVER – Ottawa’s push to implement mandatory minimum sentences is potentially adding billions of dollars in costs to the criminal justice system without reducing crime or making the public safer, says a report released Monday by a British Columbia-based rights group.

Instead, the B.C. Civil Liberties Association’s report says longer prison sentences can actually make inmates more likely to re-offend while disproportionately affecting marginalized groups.

The report adds to criticism that has followed the shift to mandatory minimums. The Conservative government has doubled the number of offences that carry compulsory sentences in less than a decade as part of its tough-on-crime agenda. Full Article

Join the discussion

  1. Avig

    Well, I feel that mandatory minimums are not at all about reducing crime or making the public safer. Mandatory minimums are a form of emotional expressiveness through law; the sentences are a way of shouting, “we hate you”—-all the while pretending to be engaged in a rational activity such as making laws.
    Those who have a need for emotional expressiveness should look for jobs in the Opera. Lawmaking should be left to rational people who actually want to solve problems.

  2. Tim

    “For certain offences, our government firmly believes that a minimum period of incarceration is justified. Canadians lose faith in the criminal justice system when they feel that the punishment does not fit the crime.”
    Notice how the proponents of harsher punishment use the words “believed” and “faith” instead of “evidence” or “studies”. I go back to an article posted on this site about the persistent use of polygraphs even though evidence shows they are not reliable. At the end of that article, the author suggests that the use of such instruments comes down to a religious belief. Modern popular crime fighting is a religion, or maybe a cult, with its own myths (offenders can’t help but offend), demons (hey folks that’s us) and sacrificial angels (Megan Kanka). Being kosher, following the rituals, is much more highly valued than being rational.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

.