ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Jan 16 Recording Uplaoded Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings

General News

CITY OF COMMERCE ORDINANCE CHALLENGED IN FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT

A sex offender ordinance adopted by the City of Commerce has been challenged in a lawsuit filed today in federal district court on behalf of a registered sex offender (“registered citizen”).

“This lawsuit was filed because the City of Commerce prohibits registered citizens from visiting the public library, parks, bus stops and commercial establishments that provide a children’s playground,” stated California RSOL president Janice Bellucci.  “The City has failed to revise or repeal its ordinance despite recent court decisions that determined such ordinances are preempted by state law.”

This is the 20th such lawsuit to be filed since March 24.  All 20 lawsuits challenge city and/or county ordinances that prohibit registered citizens from being present in public and/or private locations.  Below is a list of the local governments that have been sued prior to the City of Commerce as well as the date the suit was filed and whether the case has been settled.

Jurisdiction Date Filed Status
Pomona 3/24 settled
South Lake Tahoe 3/31 settled
National City 4/8 no settlement
Carson 4/11 no settlement
Lompoc 4/21 settled
Sacramento County 4/30 settled
Santa Ana 5/7 settled
Wasco 5/15 settled
Ontario 5/21 settled
Stockton 5/27 settled
Taft 5/29 settled
 Orange  6/17 settled
 Beaumont  6/24 settled
 Adelanto  7/21 settled
 Hesperia  7/24 settled
 Victorville  8/14 no settlement
 Westminster  8/29 settled
 South Pasadena  9/9 settlement pending
 Canyon Lake  9/24 no settlement yet
 Commerce  10/2

The City of Commerce ordinance includes restrictions regarding where registered citizens can be present or reside.  Specifically, the ordinance prohibits registered citizens from being present or residing within 300 feet of public libraries, parks, bus stops, schools and commercial establishments that provide a children’s playground.  An individual who violates the ordinance is subject to incarceration for up to six months and/or a fine of up to $1,000.

“The sex offender ordinance adopted by the City of Commerce violates both the federal and state constitutions,” stated California RSOL Vice President and attorney Chance Oberstein.  “The city’s ordinance is also inconsistent with a recent appellate court decision which determined in January 2014 that a similar ordinance, in the City of Irvine, was preempted by state law.  The California Supreme Court denied review of that decision more than five months ago — on April 23, 2014.”

Join the discussion

  1. Janice Bellucci

    In addition to the cities that have been sued, there are almost 40 cities that have voluntarily repealed their ordinances which restrict the presence of registered citizens. There are another 21 cities that are considering what to do and 5 cities that refuse to communicate despite a series of letters and phone calls. The cities in the latter category are currently under review for future lawsuits.

    • Michale

      Well as the saying goes, “Sue ’em all and let God sort ’em out”…or something like that. 😉

    • FRegistryTerrorists

      Ms. Bellucci, you are a godsend. If only there were more Americans like you that had the guts and strength to stand up and say that the “sex offender” laws are outrageously un-American and worst-than-worthless nonsense. You are on the moral side of this war.

      When these cities have already seen what has happened to so many other cities, it is so incredibly irresponsible for their supposed “leaders” to keep their laws on the books and be sued. Those “leaders” don’t have enough of a spine to tell their constituents that they simply should avoid being sued, at least. But they would rather put on a show and waste other people’s time and money. They are criminals.

      I pray that you are costing these criminal regimes as much money as possible. Don’t let them slip by just covering your costs.

      I also have to say that I love the tone of this post. I think everyone should drop the phrase “registered sex offender” and simply say “Registered Citizen” with no explanation at all about “sex offender”. I use “Registered Family” very often. I would change the first sentence of this post to read: A “sex offender” ordinance … on behalf of a registered citizen.

      Thank you for all your efforts.

      • Tim

        Your right, criminal regimes use language, suggestive labels, to distort the facts.

    • Q

      Can you post a list of the cities that refuse to communicate?

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

.