A sex offender ordinance adopted by the City of Commerce has been challenged in a lawsuit filed today in federal district court on behalf of a registered sex offender (“registered citizen”).
“This lawsuit was filed because the City of Commerce prohibits registered citizens from visiting the public library, parks, bus stops and commercial establishments that provide a children’s playground,” stated California RSOL president Janice Bellucci. “The City has failed to revise or repeal its ordinance despite recent court decisions that determined such ordinances are preempted by state law.”
This is the 20th such lawsuit to be filed since March 24. All 20 lawsuits challenge city and/or county ordinances that prohibit registered citizens from being present in public and/or private locations. Below is a list of the local governments that have been sued prior to the City of Commerce as well as the date the suit was filed and whether the case has been settled.
| Jurisdiction | Date Filed | Status |
| Pomona | 3/24 | settled |
| South Lake Tahoe | 3/31 | settled |
| National City | 4/8 | no settlement |
| Carson | 4/11 | no settlement |
| Lompoc | 4/21 | settled |
| Sacramento County | 4/30 | settled |
| Santa Ana | 5/7 | settled |
| Wasco | 5/15 | settled |
| Ontario | 5/21 | settled |
| Stockton | 5/27 | settled |
| Taft | 5/29 | settled |
| Orange | 6/17 | settled |
| Beaumont | 6/24 | settled |
| Adelanto | 7/21 | settled |
| Hesperia | 7/24 | settled |
| Victorville | 8/14 | no settlement |
| Westminster | 8/29 | settled |
| South Pasadena | 9/9 | settlement pending |
| Canyon Lake | 9/24 | no settlement yet |
| Commerce | 10/2 | |
The City of Commerce ordinance includes restrictions regarding where registered citizens can be present or reside. Specifically, the ordinance prohibits registered citizens from being present or residing within 300 feet of public libraries, parks, bus stops, schools and commercial establishments that provide a children’s playground. An individual who violates the ordinance is subject to incarceration for up to six months and/or a fine of up to $1,000.
“The sex offender ordinance adopted by the City of Commerce violates both the federal and state constitutions,” stated California RSOL Vice President and attorney Chance Oberstein. “The city’s ordinance is also inconsistent with a recent appellate court decision which determined in January 2014 that a similar ordinance, in the City of Irvine, was preempted by state law. The California Supreme Court denied review of that decision more than five months ago — on April 23, 2014.”
In addition to the cities that have been sued, there are almost 40 cities that have voluntarily repealed their ordinances which restrict the presence of registered citizens. There are another 21 cities that are considering what to do and 5 cities that refuse to communicate despite a series of letters and phone calls. The cities in the latter category are currently under review for future lawsuits.
Well as the saying goes, “Sue ’em all and let God sort ’em out”…or something like that. 😉
Ms. Bellucci, you are a godsend. If only there were more Americans like you that had the guts and strength to stand up and say that the “sex offender” laws are outrageously un-American and worst-than-worthless nonsense. You are on the moral side of this war.
When these cities have already seen what has happened to so many other cities, it is so incredibly irresponsible for their supposed “leaders” to keep their laws on the books and be sued. Those “leaders” don’t have enough of a spine to tell their constituents that they simply should avoid being sued, at least. But they would rather put on a show and waste other people’s time and money. They are criminals.
I pray that you are costing these criminal regimes as much money as possible. Don’t let them slip by just covering your costs.
I also have to say that I love the tone of this post. I think everyone should drop the phrase “registered sex offender” and simply say “Registered Citizen” with no explanation at all about “sex offender”. I use “Registered Family” very often. I would change the first sentence of this post to read: A “sex offender” ordinance … on behalf of a registered citizen.
Thank you for all your efforts.
Your right, criminal regimes use language, suggestive labels, to distort the facts.
Can you post a list of the cities that refuse to communicate?